1ch uart w/ narrow parallell interface...?

On Sat, 27 Nov 2004 07:53:06 +0100, the renowned "Meindert Sprang"
<mhsprang@NOcustomSPAMware.nl> wrote:

>"Schwob" <schwobus@aol.com> wrote in message
>news:123e50e1.0411261615.6b4dfa5c@posting.google.com...
>> Hi,
>>
>> the LPC915 has UART, 4 ADC channels and 2K FLASH.  It is much cheaper
>> than ATmega of the PIC16 proposed and does not even need an oscillator
>> (internal RC)
>
>Mmmm... I am alway very sceptic about internal oscillators in combination
>with UARTS. What do others think? Good/bad experiences?
>
>Meindert

<shrug> It's rated at +/-2.5% over temperature (and +/-1% at room
temperature). That sounds good enough to me if the divider granularity
doesn't add too much additional error, especially if you're
communicating with something that uses a crystal. 


Best regards, 
Spehro Pefhany
-- 
"it's the network..."                          "The Journey is the reward"
speff@interlog.com             Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com
Embedded software/hardware/analog  Info for designers:  http://www.speff.com

"Torbj&#4294967295;rn Heltne" <torbjorn.heltne@amelektronikk.no> skrev i meddelandet
news:41a21a6b$1@news.broadpark.no...
> Meindert Sprang wrote:
>
> > Why not go for the ATmega162. It has two serial ports.
>
> I can do without the TWI but need a couple of A/D channels.
>
> -- 
> Torbj&#4294967295;rn Heltne

For a single UART, the ATmega48 is a better choice.

-- 
Best Regards,
Ulf Samuelsson   ulf@a-t-m-e-l.com
This is a personal view which may or may not be
share by my Employer Atmel Nordic AB