EmbeddedRelated.com
Forums

Solution for long range wireless link on ISM band?

Started by ElderUberGeek April 22, 2006
I am looking for a solution for connecting equipment over a wireless
link with a range of 2-3 Km. Should be on ISM band. Any good ideas?

Thanks

Hi ElderUberGeek,

You may like to check the followin URLs;

http://www.sparkfun.com
http://www.digikey.com
http://www.embeddedcomms.com.au/products/modems.htm
http://www.rfdigital.com
http://www.rfmodules.com.au
http://www.rfsolutions.co.uk/acatalog/index.html
http://www.abacom-tech.com/home.htm
http://www.conlab.com.au/maxstream/
http://www.coronis-systems.com/produit.php?id=WCA&lang=en
http://www.glolab.com./index.html
http://www.oatleyelectronics.com
http://www.hamtronics.com/
http://www.aerocomm.com/index.htm
http://www.microhardcorp.com/index.htm
http://www.rfbasic.com/

Good luck.

Miem Chan

Miem wrote:
> > You may like to check the followin URLs;
Why should he? Usenet is not a person to person medium. Google is not Usenet, it is only a foul and atrocious interface to the real usenet. There is no reason to assume that any reader has, has had, or will ever have, access to any other article. Thus it is essential to always include adequate context. For means to do this, even on the extremely harmful google interface, see below. Especially read the referenced URLs before posting again. -- "If you want to post a followup via groups.google.com, don't use the broken "Reply" link at the bottom of the article. Click on "show options" at the top of the article, then click on the "Reply" at the bottom of the article headers." - Keith Thompson More details at: <http://cfaj.freeshell.org/google/> Also see <http://www.safalra.com/special/googlegroupsreply/>
Thanks Miem. These are great.

On Sat, 22 Apr 2006 14:48:14 -0400, CBFalconer <cbfalconer@yahoo.com>
wrote:

>Miem wrote: >> >> You may like to check the followin URLs; > >Why should he? Usenet is not a person to person medium. Google is >not Usenet, it is only a foul and atrocious interface to the real >usenet. There is no reason to assume that any reader has, has had, >or will ever have, access to any other article. Thus it is >essential to always include adequate context. For means to do >this, even on the extremely harmful google interface, see below. >Especially read the referenced URLs before posting again.
Turned out OK on my newsreader (complete thread, Forte agent reader). Although it's handy to have quoted text.. -Andrew m
http://www.chipdrive.pl/catalog/product_info.php?products_id=97
http://www.chipdrive.pl/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=37&products_id=94
http://www.chipdrive.pl/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=37&products_id=93
http://www.chipdrive.pl/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=37&products_id=93
On 22 Apr 2006 09:28:43 -0700, "ElderUberGeek" <aribloch@gmail.com>
wrote:

>I am looking for a solution for connecting equipment over a wireless >link with a range of 2-3 Km. Should be on ISM band. Any good ideas?
Except for years with high sun spot activity, the 27 MHz ISM band with CB equipment should be quite reliable with proper antennas. Without direct line-of-sight paths, getting reliable contacts on other ISM bands within legal power levels is quite uncertain. Paul