John Fields wrote:> "rickman" <gnuarm@gmail.com> wrote: >> John Fields <jfie...@austininstruments.com> wrote: >>> >>> Um, It's TTL, not CMOS. The pullup isn't a BFD. >>> >>> Here's a 7406, run it and watch what happens to the output when the >>> input floats: >>> >>> Version 4 >>> SHEET 1 880 680 >>...snip... >> >> Well, let's see... rude, obnoxious and ignorant. What a great >> combination!!! > > Ah, I see that another churl is itching to be dispatched. > >> Dude, chill out a little bit. Simulations are not the real world and >> unless you are dealing with no-neck, leather clad bikers with chains >> and drawn knives, you are better off not trying your very best to PO >> everyone you speak too. BTW, I know this from experience. :^) > > Fuck you, asshole pussy. > > Just because you said something stupid in real life/time and got > buttfucked for it in the environment you chose to embrace doesn't > mean that all of the rest of us are in the same boat. > > Can you understand that?PLONK. -- <http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/pubs/vista_cost.txt> <http://www.securityfocus.com/columnists/423> "A man who is right every time is not likely to do very much." -- Francis Crick, co-discover of DNA "There is nothing more amazing than stupidity in action." -- Thomas Matthews
driving an LED with a 7406 question
Started by ●February 13, 2007
Reply by ●February 14, 20072007-02-14
Reply by ●February 14, 20072007-02-14
John Fields wrote:> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote: > >John Fields wrote: > >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote: > >> >John Fields wrote: > >> >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >panfilero wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> >> Hello, I have a question about driving an LED with a 7406. > >> >> > > >> >> >What on earth are you using a 7406 for ? > >> >> > >> >> --- > >> >> Read the fucking thread, why don'tcha? > >> > > >> >There is nothing in the original post to indicate a reason for its use thank you > >> >very much Mr Allegedly Polite ! > >> > >> --- > >> Geez, I thought from his post (which included a diagram, BTW) that > >> he was using it as a low side LED driver and wanted some help in > >> figuring out the value of the current limiting resistor. > > > >Well ? So ? > > --- > Well, So, that's what he's using it for. > --- > > >> >Does anyone even still make a standard TTL 7406 ? It seems unlikely to me. > >> > >> --- > >> Who cares? It's what _he's_ using. > > > >Do you never think to offer advice about component selection ? > > --- > Sure, when it's warranted, but in a discussion like this one all > he's trying to do is learn how the thing works, as he's already > stated, it isn't.I'm sure it's working. It's just that he doesn't understand how it works. Graham
Reply by ●February 14, 20072007-02-14
Reply by ●February 14, 20072007-02-14
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 06:50:48 +0000, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:> > >John Fields wrote: > >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote: >> >John Fields wrote: >> >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> >John Fields wrote: >> >> >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >panfilero wrote: >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> Hello, I have a question about driving an LED with a 7406. >> >> >> > >> >> >> >What on earth are you using a 7406 for ? >> >> >> >> >> >> --- >> >> >> Read the fucking thread, why don'tcha? >> >> > >> >> >There is nothing in the original post to indicate a reason for its use thank you >> >> >very much Mr Allegedly Polite ! >> >> >> >> --- >> >> Geez, I thought from his post (which included a diagram, BTW) that >> >> he was using it as a low side LED driver and wanted some help in >> >> figuring out the value of the current limiting resistor. >> > >> >Well ? So ? >> >> --- >> Well, So, that's what he's using it for. >> --- >> >> >> >Does anyone even still make a standard TTL 7406 ? It seems unlikely to me. >> >> >> >> --- >> >> Who cares? It's what _he's_ using. >> > >> >Do you never think to offer advice about component selection ? >> >> --- >> Sure, when it's warranted, but in a discussion like this one all >> he's trying to do is learn how the thing works, as he's already >> stated, it isn't. > >I'm sure it's working. It's just that he doesn't understand how it works.--- So what does that have to do with chiding him for using TTL? -- JF
Reply by ●February 14, 20072007-02-14
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 07:02:04 +0000, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:> > >John Fields wrote: > >> Fuck you, asshole pussy. > >Mr Calm and Collected speaks again !--- What makes you think I can't be calm, collected, and profane all at the same time, motherfucker? -- JF
Reply by ●February 14, 20072007-02-14
John Fields wrote:> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote: > >John Fields wrote: > > > >> Fuck you, asshole pussy. > > > >Mr Calm and Collected speaks again ! > > --- > What makes you think I can't be calm, collected, and profane all at > the same time, motherfucker?You're rarely calm and collected. You're usually profane. Graham
Reply by ●February 14, 20072007-02-14
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 11:58:15 +0000, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:> > >John Fields wrote: > >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote: >> >John Fields wrote: >> > >> >> Fuck you, asshole pussy. >> > >> >Mr Calm and Collected speaks again ! >> >> --- >> What makes you think I can't be calm, collected, and profane all at >> the same time, motherfucker? > >You're rarely calm and collected.--- Just because you get riled up when you read what I write doesn't mean I am when I write it. --->You're usually profane.--- Profanity is in the eye of the beholder, dickhead. -- JF
Reply by ●February 14, 20072007-02-14
John Fields wrote:> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote: > > >You're usually profane. > > --- > Profanity is in the eye of the beholder, dickhead.Says it all really.
Reply by ●February 14, 20072007-02-14
On Feb 13, 8:14 pm, John Fields <jfie...@austininstruments.com> wrote:> On 13 Feb 2007 16:10:42 -0800, "rickman" <gnu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >On Feb 13, 2:35 pm, John Fields <jfie...@austininstruments.com> wrote: > >> --- > >> Um, It's TTL, not CMOS. The pullup isn't a BFD. > > >> Here's a 7406, run it and watch what happens to the output when the > >> input floats: > > >> Version 4 > >> SHEET 1 880 680 > >...snip... > > >Well, let's see... rude, obnoxious and ignorant. What a great > >combination!!! > > --- > Ah, I see that another churl is itching to be dispatched. > --- > > >>Dude, chill out a little bit. Simulations are not the real world and > >unless you are dealing with no-neck, leather clad bikers with chains > >and drawn knives, you are better off not trying your very best to PO > >everyone you speak too. BTW, I know this from experience. :^) > > --- > Fuck you, asshole pussy. > > Just because you said something stupid in real life/time and got > buttfucked for it in the environment you chose to embrace doesn't > mean that all of the rest of us are in the same boat. > > Can you understand that?Boy, now I know why they came up with LOL! When I read this everyone around me turned to see what I was laughing about!!!
Reply by ●February 14, 20072007-02-14
On 14 Feb 2007 06:38:24 -0800, "rickman" <gnuarm@gmail.com> wrote:>On Feb 13, 8:14 pm, John Fields <jfie...@austininstruments.com> wrote: >> On 13 Feb 2007 16:10:42 -0800, "rickman" <gnu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >On Feb 13, 2:35 pm, John Fields <jfie...@austininstruments.com> wrote: >> >> --- >> >> Um, It's TTL, not CMOS. The pullup isn't a BFD. >> >> >> Here's a 7406, run it and watch what happens to the output when the >> >> input floats: >> >> >> Version 4 >> >> SHEET 1 880 680 >> >...snip... >> >> >Well, let's see... rude, obnoxious and ignorant. What a great >> >combination!!! >> >> --- >> Ah, I see that another churl is itching to be dispatched. >> --- >> >> >>Dude, chill out a little bit. Simulations are not the real world and >> >unless you are dealing with no-neck, leather clad bikers with chains >> >and drawn knives, you are better off not trying your very best to PO >> >everyone you speak too. BTW, I know this from experience. :^) >> >> --- >> Fuck you, asshole pussy. >> >> Just because you said something stupid in real life/time and got >> buttfucked for it in the environment you chose to embrace doesn't >> mean that all of the rest of us are in the same boat. >> >> Can you understand that? > >Boy, now I know why they came up with LOL! When I read this everyone >around me turned to see what I was laughing about!!!--- I'm happy to put a grin on your chops anytime. :-) -- JF
