Wondered what the state of the art is on keeping embedded code secret. Who does it better these days? I see some secure processors from Atmel and a few others, but they seem more oriented to securing comms and data than in securing their own code.
Code security on modern 32bit embedded processors
Started by ●September 18, 2008
Reply by ●September 18, 20082008-09-18
tns1 wrote:> Wondered what the state of the art is on keeping embedded code secret. > Who does it better these days? > I see some secure processors from Atmel and a few others, but they seem > more oriented to securing comms and data than in securing their own code.http://www.flylogic.net/blog/?cat=3 VLV
Reply by ●September 19, 20082008-09-19
Vladimir Vassilevsky wrote:> http://www.flylogic.net/blog/?cat=3 > > VLV >If these guys do this just for fun, I suppose there must be low-profile companies who will pull the code off of any chip for $$$, no questions asked. So the best security is to design things no one wants to duplicate.
Reply by ●September 19, 20082008-09-19
> Wondered what the state of the art is on keeping embedded code secret. > Who does it better these days? > > I see some secure processors from Atmel and a few others, but they seem > more oriented to securing comms and data than in securing their own > code.ARM TrustZone provides a convenient way for authenticating code, but for confidentiality you need also some secure storage. There should be some ARM chips like that out there. Legrandin