Is there any company producing ARM7 chips with Ethernet built in?
Like the DS80C400?
Would be great not having to interface an external Ethernet chip.
Cheers Nick
btw
Merry Christmas!
Ethernet on ARM7 chip?
Started by ●December 27, 2005
Posted by ●December 27, 2005
--- In lpc2000@lpc2..., "nma550n" <nma550n@y...> wrote:
>
> Is there any company producing ARM7 chips with Ethernet built in?
> Like the DS80C400?
> Would be great not having to interface an external Ethernet chip.
>
Yes,
Samsung S3C4510B
>
> Is there any company producing ARM7 chips with Ethernet built in?
> Like the DS80C400?
> Would be great not having to interface an external Ethernet chip.
>
Yes,
Samsung S3C4510B
Posted by ●December 27, 2005
Try NetSilicon NS7520 or the AT91SAM7X.
--
Paul Curtis, Rowley Associates Ltd http://www.rowley.co.uk
CrossWorks for MSP430, ARM, AVR and now MAXQ processors
--
Paul Curtis, Rowley Associates Ltd http://www.rowley.co.uk
CrossWorks for MSP430, ARM, AVR and now MAXQ processors
Posted by ●December 27, 2005
nma550n wrote:
>Is there any company producing ARM7 chips with Ethernet built in?
>Like the DS80C400?
>Would be great not having to interface an external Ethernet chip.
>
>
>
Look at the Sharp LH79524 & LH79525 (ARM720):
http://www.sharpsma.com/productgroup.php?ProductGroupIDS&SubProductGroupID=1
Regards,
TomW
--
Tom Walsh - WN3L - Embedded Systems Consultant
http://openhardware.net, http://cyberiansoftware.com
"Windows? No thanks, I have work to do..."
----------------
>Is there any company producing ARM7 chips with Ethernet built in?
>Like the DS80C400?
>Would be great not having to interface an external Ethernet chip.
>
>
>
Look at the Sharp LH79524 & LH79525 (ARM720):
http://www.sharpsma.com/productgroup.php?ProductGroupIDS&SubProductGroupID=1
Regards,
TomW
--
Tom Walsh - WN3L - Embedded Systems Consultant
http://openhardware.net, http://cyberiansoftware.com
"Windows? No thanks, I have work to do..."
----------------
Posted by ●December 27, 2005
Cheers guys.
Are there any cheap development boards fro these chips around?
When i say cheap ~70 or less, and as a bonus avaliable in the UK?
Are there any cheap development boards fro these chips around?
When i say cheap ~70 or less, and as a bonus avaliable in the UK?
Posted by ●December 27, 2005
> Cheers guys.
>
> Are there any cheap development boards fro these chips around?
> When i say cheap ~70 or less, and as a bonus avaliable in the UK?
Samsung S3C4510B Dev board: $150 US
http://microcontrollershop.com/product_info.php?cPath&products_idw1
I'm curious if you find something more cost effective.
Phillips has mentioned they may have an LPC with EMAC sometime first quarter
06'.
Joel
>
> Are there any cheap development boards fro these chips around?
> When i say cheap ~70 or less, and as a bonus avaliable in the UK?
Samsung S3C4510B Dev board: $150 US
http://microcontrollershop.com/product_info.php?cPath&products_idw1
I'm curious if you find something more cost effective.
Phillips has mentioned they may have an LPC with EMAC sometime first quarter
06'.
Joel
Posted by ●December 28, 2005
Posted by ●December 28, 2005
I would not recommend anyone depend on "flash security" feature
until
we have had Philips come back from hols and tell us about the hidden
ISP command(s) and/or method(s) in the boot loader.
For example, invoking the undocumented T command with five arguments
(all zeroes) produces a lot of output.
Jaya
we have had Philips come back from hols and tell us about the hidden
ISP command(s) and/or method(s) in the boot loader.
For example, invoking the undocumented T command with five arguments
(all zeroes) produces a lot of output.
Jaya
Posted by ●December 28, 2005
On 28 Dec 2005, at 7:17 AM, jayasooriah wrote:
> I would not recommend anyone depend on "flash security" feature until
> we have had Philips come back from hols and tell us about the hidden
> ISP command(s) and/or method(s) in the boot loader.
*yawn* I don't suppose you could keep your insinuations about flash
security
in the original thread until you have actual proof that there is a
problem?
> I would not recommend anyone depend on "flash security" feature until
> we have had Philips come back from hols and tell us about the hidden
> ISP command(s) and/or method(s) in the boot loader.
*yawn* I don't suppose you could keep your insinuations about flash
security
in the original thread until you have actual proof that there is a
problem?
Posted by ●December 28, 2005