IAP lock up issue!

Started by Gus November 5, 2004

Hello,

I am using IAP to reprogram the LPC chips. On some chips, I call the
IAP but the IAP never returns! I assume that my code is fine because
it has been running on many many chips with no problems. All chips I
have are the same IAP (philips boot loader) version.

I just want to know if anyone has similar issue. Thanks,

Gus




An Engineer's Guide to the LPC2100 Series


Hi Gus,

what chip you are using?
What version of bootloader?
Andreas

--- In , "Gus" <gus_is_working@y...> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am using IAP to reprogram the LPC chips. On some chips, I call the
> IAP but the IAP never returns! I assume that my code is fine because
> it has been running on many many chips with no problems. All chips I
> have are the same IAP (philips boot loader) version.
>
> I just want to know if anyone has similar issue. > Thanks,
>
> Gus





I just found the answer in the errata sheet!

That is BAD. Going through hundreds of chips and reprograming them
is not fun! --- In , "Gus" <gus_is_working@y...> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am using IAP to reprogram the LPC chips. On some chips, I call
the
> IAP but the IAP never returns! I assume that my code is fine
because
> it has been running on many many chips with no problems. All chips
I
> have are the same IAP (philips boot loader) version.
>
> I just want to know if anyone has similar issue. > Thanks,
>
> Gus




I am using LPC2114. This is a srious issue to us! I can't express
how upset I am now.

Gus
--- In , "haack0815" <lpc_arm@s...> wrote:
>
> Hi Gus,
>
> what chip you are using?
> What version of bootloader? >
> Andreas
>
> --- In , "Gus" <gus_is_working@y...> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am using IAP to reprogram the LPC chips. On some chips, I call
the
> > IAP but the IAP never returns! I assume that my code is fine
because
> > it has been running on many many chips with no problems. All
chips I
> > have are the same IAP (philips boot loader) version.
> >
> > I just want to know if anyone has similar issue.
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Gus