Hi,
how can I create an assembler list file with mspgcc and eclipse?
Everything I do creates an error. Manipulating the makefile is
impossible because it's always new created.
Create Assembler List file with mspgcc and eclipse
Started by ●May 1, 2007
Reply by ●May 1, 20072007-05-01
On 2007-05-01, steven_wetzel wrote:
> how can I create an assembler list file with mspgcc
Add the following flag to the gcc command line in the makefile:
-Wa,-ahld=$(@F).l
> and eclipse?
I don't anytying about eclipse. IDEs are a huge waste of time.
Writing software with an IDE is like trying to swim while
wearing a straight-jacket.
> Everything I do creates an error. Manipulating the
> makefile is impossible because it's always new created.
That's why I don't like to use IDEs like eclipse. You can only
do things that the IDE authors have already thought about.
Take off that straight-jacket!
--
Grant Edwards grante Yow! Why don't you ever
at enter any CONTESTS,
visi.com Marvin?? Don't you know
your own ZIPCODE?
> how can I create an assembler list file with mspgcc
Add the following flag to the gcc command line in the makefile:
-Wa,-ahld=$(@F).l
> and eclipse?
I don't anytying about eclipse. IDEs are a huge waste of time.
Writing software with an IDE is like trying to swim while
wearing a straight-jacket.
> Everything I do creates an error. Manipulating the
> makefile is impossible because it's always new created.
That's why I don't like to use IDEs like eclipse. You can only
do things that the IDE authors have already thought about.
Take off that straight-jacket!
--
Grant Edwards grante Yow! Why don't you ever
at enter any CONTESTS,
visi.com Marvin?? Don't you know
your own ZIPCODE?
Reply by ●May 1, 20072007-05-01
Hi Grant.
If you don't use an IDE, then what do you use to edit
and debug?
Rick.
--- Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2007-05-01, steven_wetzel
> wrote:
>
> > how can I create an assembler list file with
> mspgcc
>
> Add the following flag to the gcc command line in
> the makefile:
>
> -Wa,-ahld=$(@F).l
>
> > and eclipse?
>
> I don't anytying about eclipse. IDEs are a huge
> waste of time.
> Writing software with an IDE is like trying to swim
> while
> wearing a straight-jacket.
>
> > Everything I do creates an error. Manipulating the
> > makefile is impossible because it's always new
> created.
>
> That's why I don't like to use IDEs like eclipse.
> You can only
> do things that the IDE authors have already thought
> about.
>
> Take off that straight-jacket!
>
> --
> Grant Edwards grante
> Yow! Why don't you ever
> at
> enter any CONTESTS,
> visi.com
> Marvin?? Don't you know
>
> your own ZIPCODE?
__________________________________________________
If you don't use an IDE, then what do you use to edit
and debug?
Rick.
--- Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2007-05-01, steven_wetzel
> wrote:
>
> > how can I create an assembler list file with
> mspgcc
>
> Add the following flag to the gcc command line in
> the makefile:
>
> -Wa,-ahld=$(@F).l
>
> > and eclipse?
>
> I don't anytying about eclipse. IDEs are a huge
> waste of time.
> Writing software with an IDE is like trying to swim
> while
> wearing a straight-jacket.
>
> > Everything I do creates an error. Manipulating the
> > makefile is impossible because it's always new
> created.
>
> That's why I don't like to use IDEs like eclipse.
> You can only
> do things that the IDE authors have already thought
> about.
>
> Take off that straight-jacket!
>
> --
> Grant Edwards grante
> Yow! Why don't you ever
> at
> enter any CONTESTS,
> visi.com
> Marvin?? Don't you know
>
> your own ZIPCODE?
__________________________________________________
Reply by ●May 1, 20072007-05-01
>> That's why I don't like to use IDEs like
eclipse. You can only do things
>> that the IDE authors have already thought about.
>> Take off that straight-jacket!
>> Grant Edwards
In major multi-person software projects, a HUGE batch and/or MAKE file file
is often used to build a complete system.
IDEs don't help much in such environments.
Also, when you get a group of skilled developers several will have their own
favourite editors / IDEs.
For example, I often use use a Borland IDE to edit code. I also use it to
test code fragments in the PC world where possible.
>> that the IDE authors have already thought about.
>> Take off that straight-jacket!
>> Grant Edwards
In major multi-person software projects, a HUGE batch and/or MAKE file file
is often used to build a complete system.
IDEs don't help much in such environments.
Also, when you get a group of skilled developers several will have their own
favourite editors / IDEs.
For example, I often use use a Borland IDE to edit code. I also use it to
test code fragments in the PC world where possible.
Reply by ●May 1, 20072007-05-01
On 2007-05-01, Rick wrote:
> If you don't use an IDE, then what do you use to edit
I mainly use JED for editing .
Occasionally I use scite when I want to do folding
.
> and debug?
Mostly I don't. I try to avoid "debugging" by doing
incremental development (testing as I add features). When
something doesn't work as expected, I usually just look at the
source code and think about the program's actual behavior vs.
its observed behavior. To help avoid bugs I crank up the
compiler warnings to the max and tell it to treat all warnings
as errors.
About 6 years ago at ESC, Texas Instruments gave out T-shirts I
thought were brilliant: they had a picture of a human brain and
below that it says "Use the Logic Analyzer Nature Gave You". I
still wear mine.
When I do get stuck, I usually just put in a printf() or two.
When that fails, I fire up GDB. When I do use GDB, I usually
use it from the command line. Maybe once or twice a year I use
the DDD GUI front-end for GDB.
--
Grant Edwards grante Yow! This PIZZA symbolizes
at my COMPLETE EMOTIONAL
visi.com RECOVERY!!
> If you don't use an IDE, then what do you use to edit
I mainly use JED for editing .
Occasionally I use scite when I want to do folding
.
> and debug?
Mostly I don't. I try to avoid "debugging" by doing
incremental development (testing as I add features). When
something doesn't work as expected, I usually just look at the
source code and think about the program's actual behavior vs.
its observed behavior. To help avoid bugs I crank up the
compiler warnings to the max and tell it to treat all warnings
as errors.
About 6 years ago at ESC, Texas Instruments gave out T-shirts I
thought were brilliant: they had a picture of a human brain and
below that it says "Use the Logic Analyzer Nature Gave You". I
still wear mine.
When I do get stuck, I usually just put in a printf() or two.
When that fails, I fire up GDB. When I do use GDB, I usually
use it from the command line. Maybe once or twice a year I use
the DDD GUI front-end for GDB.
--
Grant Edwards grante Yow! This PIZZA symbolizes
at my COMPLETE EMOTIONAL
visi.com RECOVERY!!
Reply by ●May 1, 20072007-05-01
--- In m..., Grant Edwards wrote:
> ...
> > and debug?
>
> Mostly I don't. I try to avoid "debugging" by doing
> incremental development (testing as I add features). When
> something doesn't work as expected, I usually just look at the
> source code and think about the program's actual behavior vs.
> its observed behavior. ...
>
> ... "Use the Logic Analyzer Nature Gave You"... I
> ...
I couldn't agree more!
My logic analyzer is 72 years old and I intend to keep using it.
> ...
> > and debug?
>
> Mostly I don't. I try to avoid "debugging" by doing
> incremental development (testing as I add features). When
> something doesn't work as expected, I usually just look at the
> source code and think about the program's actual behavior vs.
> its observed behavior. ...
>
> ... "Use the Logic Analyzer Nature Gave You"... I
> ...
I couldn't agree more!
My logic analyzer is 72 years old and I intend to keep using it.
