EmbeddedRelated.com
Forums
The 2024 Embedded Online Conference

Differences betwen PIC16F84 and PIC16F84A

Started by Mohammad Ibnu Malik April 14, 2003
Dear Groups
Please explain to me, what's the deference(s) between
PIC16F84 and PIC16F84A ?

Regards

Malik

__________________________________________________




The A parts are a new CMOS version, and are cheaper to mfr., and therefore
cheaper to buy. They also have a different programming requirement...and my
expereince with the '876 parts is that the A versions program significantly
faster with fewer errors.

FWIW, if you are looking into either of these chips, I would recommend a
different chip all together. I think it's the '672, but I'm probably
wrong...either way, there's a new one out that's cheaper, and has more
features. (More memory, at the least.) I haven't memorized the part number
because I haven't been working with projects simple enough for them.

Cliff
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mohammad Ibnu Malik" <>
To: <>
Sent: Monday, April 14, 2003 6:16 PM
Subject: [piclist] Differences betwen PIC16F84 and PIC16F84A > Dear Groups
> Please explain to me, what's the deference(s) between
> PIC16F84 and PIC16F84A ?
>
> Regards
>
> Malik
>
> __________________________________________________ > to unsubscribe, go to http://www.yahoogroups.com and follow the
instructions
>
> ">http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ >


The replacement part Cliff is thinking of is the 16F628, which is pin compatible with the 16F84, but adds more peripherials, can run without a xtal or RC, adds a USART, supports ICSP, and cost about half the price of the 16F84.
----- Original Message -----
From: Cliff Griffin
To: p...@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, April 14, 2003 8:23 PM
Subject: Re: [piclist] Differences betwen PIC16F84 and PIC16F84A

The A parts are a new CMOS version, and are cheaper to mfr., and therefore
cheaper to buy. They also have a different programming requirement...and my
expereince with the '876 parts is that the A versions program significantly
faster with fewer errors.

FWIW, if you are looking into either of these chips, I would recommend a
different chip all together. I think it's the '672, but I'm probably
wrong...either way, there's a new one out that's cheaper, and has more
features. (More memory, at the least.) I haven't memorized the part number
because I haven't been working with projects simple enough for them.

Cliff
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mohammad Ibnu Malik" <a...@yahoo.com>
To: <p...@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, April 14, 2003 6:16 PM
Subject: [piclist] Differences betwen PIC16F84 and PIC16F84A> Dear Groups
> Please explain to me, what's the deference(s) between
> PIC16F84 and PIC16F84A ?
>
> Regards
>
> Malik
>
> __________________________________________________> to unsubscribe, go to http://www.yahoogroups.com and follow the
instructions
>
> ">http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


to unsubscribe, go to http://www.yahoogroups.com and follow the instructions

">Yahoo! Terms of Service.


> Please explain to me, what's the deference(s) between
> PIC16F84 and PIC16F84A ?

http://www.microchip.com/1010/pline/picmicro/category/digictrl/8kbytes/d
evices/16f84a/index.htm

document: 16F84 to 16F84A migration

But forget about both, there are newer chips that are both better and
cheaper (for instance 16FF628).

Wouter van Ooijen

-- -------
Van Ooijen Technische Informatica: www.voti.nl
consultancy, development, PICmicro products



The 2024 Embedded Online Conference