HI I m Sridar new member of this group. I wish u all happy new year. M fresh B.E. Electrical and Electronics Engg. graduate. Now m doing Embedded system and design course. Can any one clarify my queries ? 1.I wish to do my project on finger print sensor as part of my course. I dont know which type of sensor is effective to use(whether optical, thermal or capacitive) 2. Project is about the access control sytem. so i dont want to interface with PC. Simply want to interface with MicroControllers.Can u guys have any experience in finger print sensor interfacing this sensors please share with me 3.Plase let me know about some In system Programmers- Microcontrollers. Thanks & Regards Sridhar
Want to know about Finger Print Sensors
Started by ●January 6, 2007
Reply by ●January 6, 20072007-01-06
sri wrote:> > I m Sridar new member of this group. > I wish u all happy new year. > M fresh B.E. Electrical and Electronics Engg. graduate. Now m doing > Embedded system and design course. > > Can any one clarify my queries ?No. I read no further than the childish geek speek. U rarely posts here. I have never heard of M, except in James Bond movies. If you want to communicate, so so in as clear language as you are capable of. Don't make your readers guess. In addition, this group does not have members, it is a (very poor) google interface to the usenet system, which is open to all. -- Chuck F (cbfalconer at maineline dot net) Available for consulting/temporary embedded and systems. <http://cbfalconer.home.att.net>
Reply by ●January 6, 20072007-01-06
sri wrote:> HI > I m Sridar new member of this group. > I wish u all happy new year. > M fresh B.E. Electrical and Electronics Engg. graduate. Now m doing > Embedded system and design course. > > Can any one clarify my queries ? > > 1.I wish to do my project on finger print sensor as part of my course. > I dont know which type of sensor is effective to use(whether optical, > thermal or capacitive) > 2. Project is about the access control sytem. so i dont want to > interface with PC. > Simply want to interface with MicroControllers.Can u guys have any > experience in finger print sensor interfacing this sensors please share > with me > 3.Plase let me know about some In system Programmers- > Microcontrollers.Sridhar, all sensors are effective to use. They all have different capabilities and constraints and a different pricing. If possible start with an optical one that is basedon total reflection. it gives the nicest images and the least artefacts. You best interface to a PC and develop on a PC. Consider an embedded system later. It is much simpler to develop some software with less constraints, especially when it comes to fingerprints. Be prepared that the problems increase exponentially. That shouldn't pose a problem as long as you accept an incomplete work as sufficiently satisfying as you learnt something and as long as your superiors accept it as such too. You just report some interesting stories on what you did and what you achieved. See http://www.ibrtses.com/projects/fingerprint.html Rene -- Ing.Buero R.Tschaggelar - http://www.ibrtses.com & commercial newsgroups - http://www.talkto.net
Reply by ●January 6, 20072007-01-06
On Sat, 06 Jan 2007 12:16:21 -0500, in comp.arch.embedded CBFalconer <cbfalconer@yahoo.com> wrote:>sri wrote: >> >> I m Sridar new member of this group. >> I wish u all happy new year. >> M fresh B.E. Electrical and Electronics Engg. graduate. Now m doing >> Embedded system and design course. >> >> Can any one clarify my queries ? > >No. I read no further than the childish geek speek.Regretably, I disagree with you, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leet It's extremely common with humans that at a guess are > 6dB younger than you. Languages are dynamic, as we, the dinosaurs, are finding out. (What did your parents think about Punk?) The more worrying aspect is that the kidz expect to be spoon fed, are unable to use search engines, unless it's for bittorrent downloads, and rarely give any significant information in the original post. Sorry for not top posting :-) martin
Reply by ●January 7, 20072007-01-07
In article <f2vvp2dpdpnmh0kf2bhnj3nnq97pu8mo30@4ax.com>, martin griffith <mart_in_medina@ya___.es> writes>On Sat, 06 Jan 2007 12:16:21 -0500, in comp.arch.embedded CBFalconer ><cbfalconer@yahoo.com> wrote: > >>sri wrote: >>> >>> I m Sridar new member of this group. >>> I wish u all happy new year. >>> M fresh B.E. Electrical and Electronics Engg. graduate. Now m doing >>> Embedded system and design course. >>> >>> Can any one clarify my queries ? >> >>No. I read no further than the childish geek speek. > >Regretably, I disagree with you, >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leet >It's extremely common with humans that at a guess are > 6dB younger >than you. >Languages are dynamic, as we, the dinosaurs, are finding out. (What >did your parents think about Punk?)Yes English is a living language however as in all communications you need to be clear and use a subset that the majority or at least your target audience will understand. You need to make the effort to communicate with those who have the information you need. As the OP needs to communicate with the old dinosaurs who have the experience and knowledge then he need to use a protocol they will understand and not piss them off.>The more worrying aspect is that the kidz expect to be spoon fed, are >unable to use search engines, unless it's for bittorrent downloads, >and rarely give any significant information in the original post.I agree. If the are seeing usenet via goggle groups you would have thought that they might have looked to see if google has a search facility. (If it does not they are probably others :-) The term "Research" seems to have become redundant in "R&D" these days. Apology accepted :-)>Sorry for not top posting :-) >martin-- \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ \/\/\/\/\ Chris Hills Staffs England /\/\/\/\/ /\/\/ chris@phaedsys.org www.phaedsys.org \/\/\ \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
Reply by ●January 7, 20072007-01-07
Chris Hills wrote:> In article <f2vvp2dpdpnmh0kf2bhnj3nnq97pu8mo30@4ax.com>, martin griffith > <mart_in_medina@ya___.es> writes > >> On Sat, 06 Jan 2007 12:16:21 -0500, in comp.arch.embedded CBFalconer >> <cbfalconer@yahoo.com> wrote: >> >>> sri wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> I m Sridar new member of this group. >>>> I wish u all happy new year. >>>> M fresh B.E. Electrical and Electronics Engg. graduate. Now m doing >>>> Embedded system and design course. >>>> >>>> Can any one clarify my queries ? >>> >>> >>> No. I read no further than the childish geek speek. >> >> >> Regretably, I disagree with you, >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leet >> It's extremely common with humans that at a guess are > 6dB younger >> than you. >> Languages are dynamic, as we, the dinosaurs, are finding out. (What >> did your parents think about Punk?) > > > Yes English is a living language however as in all communications you > need to be clear and use a subset that the majority or at least your > target audience will understand. You need to make the effort to > communicate with those who have the information you need. > > As the OP needs to communicate with the old dinosaurs who have the > experience and knowledge then he need to use a protocol they will > understand and not piss them off. > >> The more worrying aspect is that the kidz expect to be spoon fed, are >> unable to use search engines, unless it's for bittorrent downloads, >> and rarely give any significant information in the original post. > > > I agree. If the are seeing usenet via goggle groups you would have > thought that they might have looked to see if google has a search > facility. (If it does not they are probably others :-) > > The term "Research" seems to have become redundant in "R&D" these days. > > Apology accepted :-) >What a reactionary, curmudgeonly lot we seem to be here and only a few days into what should optimism for the new year and a fresh start. The op may have limited grasp of English and it's bad manners to criticise on that point alone. How can you expect to encourage and inspire the next generation to have passion for the subject if our generation is so small minded and mean spirited ?. Good parents encourage and guide, not criticise for the smallest transgression. Hardening of the attitudes perhaps ?. .. Chris
Reply by ●January 7, 20072007-01-07
>The op may have limited grasp of English and it's bad manners to criticise >on that point alone.On the contrary. You misunderstand the objection. WKS is the problem (Wanky Kids Speak - that has not made it into Wikipedia yet). R U Comprehending? LOL.
Reply by ●January 7, 20072007-01-07
In article <eK5oh.42723$KT2.31654@newsfe2-win.ntli.net>, ChrisQuayle <nospam@devnul.co.uk> writes>Chris Hills wrote: >> In article <f2vvp2dpdpnmh0kf2bhnj3nnq97pu8mo30@4ax.com>, martin >>griffith <mart_in_medina@ya___.es> writes >> >>> On Sat, 06 Jan 2007 12:16:21 -0500, in comp.arch.embedded CBFalconer >>> <cbfalconer@yahoo.com> wrote: >>> >>>> sri wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> I m Sridar new member of this group. >>>>> I wish u all happy new year. >>>>> M fresh B.E. Electrical and Electronics Engg. graduate. Now m doing >>>>> Embedded system and design course. >>>>> >>>>> Can any one clarify my queries ? >>>> >>>> >>>> No. I read no further than the childish geek speek. >>> >>> >>> Regretably, I disagree with you, >>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leet >>> It's extremely common with humans that at a guess are > 6dB younger >>> than you. >>> Languages are dynamic, as we, the dinosaurs, are finding out. (What >>> did your parents think about Punk?) >> Yes English is a living language however as in all communications >>you need to be clear and use a subset that the majority or at least >>your target audience will understand. You need to make the effort to >>communicate with those who have the information you need. >> As the OP needs to communicate with the old dinosaurs who have the >>experience and knowledge then he need to use a protocol they will >>understand and not piss them off. >> >>> The more worrying aspect is that the kidz expect to be spoon fed, >>>are >>> unable to use search engines, unless it's for bittorrent downloads, >>> and rarely give any significant information in the original post. >> I agree. If the are seeing usenet via goggle groups you would have >>thought that they might have looked to see if google has a search >>facility. (If it does not they are probably others :-) >> The term "Research" seems to have become redundant in "R&D" these >>days. >> Apology accepted :-) >> > >What a reactionary, curmudgeonly lot we seem to be here and only a few >days into what should optimism for the new year and a fresh start. The >op may have limited grasp of English and it's bad manners to criticise >on that point alone.> >How can you expect to encourage and inspire the next generation to have >passion for the subject if our generation is so small minded and mean >spirited ?. Good parents encourage and guide, not criticise for the >smallest transgression. > >Hardening of the attitudes perhaps ?. ..A Hardening of attitudes, arteries, hearing etc... something to do with age I think. I look back over my (several decades) of training and learning and remember that I had to put in the effort to communicate with the "old masters" and do some of the hard work myself. No one appeared to make it easy. This was a way of making me improve myself and learning to research for myself. It used to be called an apprenticeship. We have had this discussion here several times of late. People asking questions in txt spk without having done even the most basic research. What is being asked for is plain English with as little slang as possible. (This includes native English and American writers) so that the majority have a chance of understanding the question. For those who English is not their mother tongue (Including Americans ? :-) you would have thought it easier to attempt correct basic English that the text the OP posted. Also if you show that you have at least done some basic research or work yourself then many will and do pitch in and help. Most of the long serving people on here have very busy lives and businesses. They will help if met half way. The seems to be a new bread of poster who expect the "Old Dinosaurs" to do the extra work of decoding what these posters mean and second guess what they want. The problem is that many expect instant answers without doing the research Their first action is to ask the question here not do some basic research first or even properly formulate and evolve their question. Then write in plain English. I can (just about) write in plain German but I have no idea how to write txt spk Auf Deutsch. SO I would suggest if th eOP can write in the form he did then he could write in clearer English than he did. -- \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ \/\/\/\/\ Chris Hills Staffs England /\/\/\/\/ /\/\/ chris@phaedsys.org www.phaedsys.org \/\/\ \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
Reply by ●January 7, 20072007-01-07
In article <ud6oh.26832$k74.15324@text.news.blueyonder.co.uk>, WKS <non.given@hotmail.con> writes> > >>The op may have limited grasp of English and it's bad manners to criticise >>on that point alone. > >On the contrary. You misunderstand the objection. > >WKS is the problem (Wanky Kids Speak - that has not made it into Wikipedia >yet). > >R U Comprehending? LOL.I no wot u men bt ? sud i hav 2 trsl8 its no me wot ned hlp. OP ned hlp. WKS is now in the dictionary. BTW to be able to speak WKS you first have to understand English.... Using WKS might appear flash to his mates but is no use if he wants to communicate with the Old Dinasours who have the answers. Sure we were rad and cool when we were young speaking amongst ourselves but when we spoke to out lecturers and employers etc we used a language they would understand. That or we failed the course or got sacked. I don't mind who uses WKS, the more of them the better because people who do the hiring don't speak WKS. They won't get jobs leaving more for me. They will learn and I expect the language will bend a little but it is not the Old Dinosaurs that will come off worse in this one. -- \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ \/\/\/\/\ Chris Hills Staffs England /\/\/\/\/ /\/\/ chris@phaedsys.org www.phaedsys.org \/\/\ \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
Reply by ●January 7, 20072007-01-07
ChrisQuayle wrote:> Chris Hills wrote: >> <mart_in_medina@ya___.es> writes >>> <cbfalconer@yahoo.com> wrote: >>>... snip ...> > What a reactionary, curmudgeonly lot we seem to be here and only a > few days into what should optimism for the new year and a fresh > start. The op may have limited grasp of English and it's bad manners > to criticise on that point alone. > > How can you expect to encourage and inspire the next generation to > have passion for the subject if our generation is so small minded > and mean spirited ?. Good parents encourage and guide, not criticise > for the smallest transgression.If you look back the appropriate number of levels, I think you will find that my original objection explained the reasons. People seem to like to snip to an isolated sentence, rather than complete paragraphs, which would at least maintain something of the original tone. -- Chuck F (cbfalconer at maineline dot net) Available for consulting/temporary embedded and systems. <http://cbfalconer.home.att.net>
