> > But that was not the original topic. The original topic was the > relative merits of having single cycle access to Flash (program) > memory. You had said that it was not as fast as using a FIFO and I > have been trying to dispute that since. You have been talking about a > lot of irrelevant topics since.You can't, because it is not faster to have single cycle access if your MHz is low. We ARE comparing a 50 MHz chip to a 66 MHz chip. If we assume each jump is followed by 4 instructions, then * it will take 5 clocks @ 50 MHz for the CM3: 50/5 = 10 * It will take 6 clocks @ 66 MHz for the AVR32: 66/6 = 11 The AVR32 is faster, even with 1 waitstate on the first access... -- Best Regards, Ulf Samuelsson This is intended to be my personal opinion which may, or may not be shared by my employer Atmel Nordic AB
New ARM Cortex Microcontroller Product Family from STMicroelectronics
Started by ●June 18, 2007
Reply by ●July 27, 20072007-07-27