hi,
and what about that?
http://sourceforge.net/projects/freescaleotcp/
Andrew
________________________________
From: lpc2000@lpc2... [mailto:lpc2000@lpc2...] On Behalf Of
Joel Winarske
Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2006 11:08 PM
To: lpc2000@lpc2...
Subject: RE: [lpc2000] tcpip
Hi Marko,
> Recently I was in the same dilemma. Is the OpenTCP
project still active
> ? I am about to integrate a TCP stack in my RTOS and I am choosing with
> which one to go.
Last release of OpenTCP: 2003-08-03
The last post may sum it up on OpenTCP:
http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?thread_id31838&forum_id"4425
Paul what where the big differences between lwIP and uIP?
Joel
SPONSORED LINKS
Microprocessor
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Microprocessor&w1=Microprocessor&w2=Mic
rocontrollers&w3=Pic+microcontrollers&w451+microprocessor&c=4&s&.sig=t
sVC-J9hJ5qyXg0WPR0l6g> Microcontrollers
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Microcontrollers&w1=Microprocessor&w2=M
icrocontrollers&w3=Pic+microcontrollers&w451+microprocessor&c=4&s&.sig
=DvJVNqC_pqRTm8Xq01nxwg> Pic microcontrollers
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Pic+microcontrollers&w1=Microprocessor&
w2=Microcontrollers&w3=Pic+microcontrollers&w451+microprocessor&c=4&s&
.sig=TpkoX4KofDJ7c6LyBvUqVQ>
8051 microprocessor
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k51+microprocessor&w1=Microprocessor&w
2=Microcontrollers&w3=Pic+microcontrollers&w451+microprocessor&c=4&s&.
sig=1Ipf1Fjfbd_HVIlekkDP-A>
________________________________
> .
________________________________
tcpip
Started by ●January 13, 2006
Reply by ●January 16, 20062006-01-16
Reply by ●January 16, 20062006-01-16
Hi Andrew,
> and what about that?
>
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/freescaleotcp/
It's fairly recent. August 31, 2005.
Only ten of the OpenTCP-1.0.4.src files are modified. Most changes are
compiler related. http_server.c seems to have the largest delta. On others
the only changes are removal of the license header, and include directories.
I would start with this version over OpenTCP-1.0.4.src, as there are some
useful looking changes. Joel
> and what about that?
>
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/freescaleotcp/
It's fairly recent. August 31, 2005.
Only ten of the OpenTCP-1.0.4.src files are modified. Most changes are
compiler related. http_server.c seems to have the largest delta. On others
the only changes are removal of the license header, and include directories.
I would start with this version over OpenTCP-1.0.4.src, as there are some
useful looking changes. Joel
Reply by ●January 16, 20062006-01-16
Here I use firefox and it works fine.
Joel Winarske wrote:
> > The lwIP demo uses the same hardware as the uIP demo so they cannot both
> > be
> > live at the same time. The demo is also a bit basic with just a single
> > page
> > of dynamic text being returned. As it was not live I didn't do anything
> > fancy (the uIP demo uses frames and contains graphics if you go to the
> > root
> > rather than the links I gave). > Perhaps you might periodically rotate between the two? > > There is a live LPC2124 / Crystal LAN CS8900 demo. This is basically
> > Pauls
> > code running (practically unmodified) as a task under FreeRTOS.org. Due
> > to
> > hardware limitations it bit bangs the NIC and does not use interrupts.
> > See
> > http://www.freertos.org/embeddedtcp.html for the various links. > This one does not load in Firefox, IE is fine. "Alert - The document
> contains no data". > Joel >
>
> SPONSORED LINKS
> Microprocessor
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Microprocessor&w1=Microprocessor&w2=Microcontrollers&w3=Pic+microcontrollers&w451+microprocessor&c=4&s&.sig=tsVC-J9hJ5qyXg0WPR0l6g>
> Microcontrollers
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Microcontrollers&w1=Microprocessor&w2=Microcontrollers&w3=Pic+microcontrollers&w451+microprocessor&c=4&s&.sig=DvJVNqC_pqRTm8Xq01nxwg>
> Pic microcontrollers
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Pic+microcontrollers&w1=Microprocessor&w2=Microcontrollers&w3=Pic+microcontrollers&w451+microprocessor&c=4&s&.sig=TpkoX4KofDJ7c6LyBvUqVQ>
>
> 8051 microprocessor
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k51+microprocessor&w1=Microprocessor&w2=Microcontrollers&w3=Pic+microcontrollers&w451+microprocessor&c=4&s&.sig=1Ipf1Fjfbd_HVIlekkDP-A >
>
> >. >
>
Joel Winarske wrote:
> > The lwIP demo uses the same hardware as the uIP demo so they cannot both
> > be
> > live at the same time. The demo is also a bit basic with just a single
> > page
> > of dynamic text being returned. As it was not live I didn't do anything
> > fancy (the uIP demo uses frames and contains graphics if you go to the
> > root
> > rather than the links I gave). > Perhaps you might periodically rotate between the two? > > There is a live LPC2124 / Crystal LAN CS8900 demo. This is basically
> > Pauls
> > code running (practically unmodified) as a task under FreeRTOS.org. Due
> > to
> > hardware limitations it bit bangs the NIC and does not use interrupts.
> > See
> > http://www.freertos.org/embeddedtcp.html for the various links. > This one does not load in Firefox, IE is fine. "Alert - The document
> contains no data". > Joel >
>
> SPONSORED LINKS
> Microprocessor
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Microprocessor&w1=Microprocessor&w2=Microcontrollers&w3=Pic+microcontrollers&w451+microprocessor&c=4&s&.sig=tsVC-J9hJ5qyXg0WPR0l6g>
> Microcontrollers
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Microcontrollers&w1=Microprocessor&w2=Microcontrollers&w3=Pic+microcontrollers&w451+microprocessor&c=4&s&.sig=DvJVNqC_pqRTm8Xq01nxwg>
> Pic microcontrollers
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Pic+microcontrollers&w1=Microprocessor&w2=Microcontrollers&w3=Pic+microcontrollers&w451+microprocessor&c=4&s&.sig=TpkoX4KofDJ7c6LyBvUqVQ>
>
> 8051 microprocessor
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k51+microprocessor&w1=Microprocessor&w2=Microcontrollers&w3=Pic+microcontrollers&w451+microprocessor&c=4&s&.sig=1Ipf1Fjfbd_HVIlekkDP-A >
>
> >. >
>
Reply by ●January 16, 20062006-01-16
It works fine on the AT91SAM7X demo, and not the Crystal demo. I had the
same results some time back. If I browse the Crystal demo in IE, it's fine.
I'm running the default install on Firefox, no tweaks.
same results some time back. If I browse the Crystal demo in IE, it's fine.
I'm running the default install on Firefox, no tweaks.
Reply by ●January 16, 20062006-01-16
Here too.
Win XP Pro.
Firefox 1.5
http://82.32.114.142:47821/
http://82.32.114.142:47820/
http://82.32.114.142:47822/cgi/tcp
http://82.32.114.142:47822/cgi/rtos
all of them works fine.
Joel Winarske wrote:
> It works fine on the AT91SAM7X demo, and not the Crystal demo. I had the
> same results some time back. If I browse the Crystal demo in IE, it's
> fine.
>
> I'm running the default install on Firefox, no tweaks. >
>
> >. >
>
Win XP Pro.
Firefox 1.5
http://82.32.114.142:47821/
http://82.32.114.142:47820/
http://82.32.114.142:47822/cgi/tcp
http://82.32.114.142:47822/cgi/rtos
all of them works fine.
Joel Winarske wrote:
> It works fine on the AT91SAM7X demo, and not the Crystal demo. I had the
> same results some time back. If I browse the Crystal demo in IE, it's
> fine.
>
> I'm running the default install on Firefox, no tweaks. >
>
> >. >
>
Reply by ●January 16, 20062006-01-16
> Here too.
> Win XP Pro.
> Firefox 1.5
>
> http://82.32.114.142:47821/
> http://82.32.114.142:47820/
> http://82.32.114.142:47822/cgi/tcp
> http://82.32.114.142:47822/cgi/rtos
>
> all of them works fine.
Hmm. First round the second listed was giving me "The document contains
no data." After multiple tries through the list then the second worked and
the first start complaining. Are all of these running uIP I wonder?
XP
Firefox 1.0.7
> Win XP Pro.
> Firefox 1.5
>
> http://82.32.114.142:47821/
> http://82.32.114.142:47820/
> http://82.32.114.142:47822/cgi/tcp
> http://82.32.114.142:47822/cgi/rtos
>
> all of them works fine.
Hmm. First round the second listed was giving me "The document contains
no data." After multiple tries through the list then the second worked and
the first start complaining. Are all of these running uIP I wonder?
XP
Firefox 1.0.7
Reply by ●January 16, 20062006-01-16
> > Here too.
> > Win XP Pro.
> > Firefox 1.5
> >
> > http://82.32.114.142:47821/
> > http://82.32.114.142:47820/
> > http://82.32.114.142:47822/cgi/tcp
> > http://82.32.114.142:47822/cgi/rtos
> >
> > all of them works fine. > Hmm. First round the second listed was giving me "The document contains
> no data." After multiple tries through the list then the second worked
and
> the first start complaining. Are all of these running uIP I wonder?
>
> XP
> Firefox 1.0.7
The 47820 port is using a WizNET I2C interface.
The 47821 is Pauls uIP demo bit banging a Crystal LAN running as a task
under FreeRTOS (LPC).
The 47822 is uIP running with interrupts and DMA on a SAM7X.
The number of simultaneous connections is limited (#define in the code). If
you look at a page that sends lots of small packets then each takes a
connection. I imagine that posting the addresses here is generating several
simulations hits, so maybe its just running out of connections hence the
intermittence.
All works fine for me, but the boards are only a few feet away. Also I'm
using IE rather than Firefox.
Regards,
Richard.
http://www.FreeRTOS.org
Reply by ●January 16, 20062006-01-16
IE loads them fine on my machine. On the ones in question, in IE there is
a
delayed load between the header and body.
It's a curious difference between Firefox and IE.
A tracert of 82.32.114.142 results in over 30 network hops. This may have a
bearing on things. Are you in the UK? I'm in California. Joel
> > > Here too.
> > > Win XP Pro.
> > > Firefox 1.5
> > >
> > > http://82.32.114.142:47821/
> > > http://82.32.114.142:47820/
> > > http://82.32.114.142:47822/cgi/tcp
> > > http://82.32.114.142:47822/cgi/rtos
> > >
> > > all of them works fine.
> >
> >
> > Hmm. First round the second listed was giving me "The document
> contains
> > no data." After multiple tries through the list then the second worked
> and
> > the first start complaining. Are all of these running uIP I wonder?
> >
> > XP
> > Firefox 1.0.7 > The 47820 port is using a WizNET I2C interface.
>
> The 47821 is Pauls uIP demo bit banging a Crystal LAN running as a task
> under FreeRTOS (LPC).
>
> The 47822 is uIP running with interrupts and DMA on a SAM7X.
>
> The number of simultaneous connections is limited (#define in the code).
> If
> you look at a page that sends lots of small packets then each takes a
> connection. I imagine that posting the addresses here is generating
> several
> simulations hits, so maybe its just running out of connections hence the
> intermittence.
>
> All works fine for me, but the boards are only a few feet away. Also I'm
> using IE rather than Firefox.
delayed load between the header and body.
It's a curious difference between Firefox and IE.
A tracert of 82.32.114.142 results in over 30 network hops. This may have a
bearing on things. Are you in the UK? I'm in California. Joel
> > > Here too.
> > > Win XP Pro.
> > > Firefox 1.5
> > >
> > > http://82.32.114.142:47821/
> > > http://82.32.114.142:47820/
> > > http://82.32.114.142:47822/cgi/tcp
> > > http://82.32.114.142:47822/cgi/rtos
> > >
> > > all of them works fine.
> >
> >
> > Hmm. First round the second listed was giving me "The document
> contains
> > no data." After multiple tries through the list then the second worked
> and
> > the first start complaining. Are all of these running uIP I wonder?
> >
> > XP
> > Firefox 1.0.7 > The 47820 port is using a WizNET I2C interface.
>
> The 47821 is Pauls uIP demo bit banging a Crystal LAN running as a task
> under FreeRTOS (LPC).
>
> The 47822 is uIP running with interrupts and DMA on a SAM7X.
>
> The number of simultaneous connections is limited (#define in the code).
> If
> you look at a page that sends lots of small packets then each takes a
> connection. I imagine that posting the addresses here is generating
> several
> simulations hits, so maybe its just running out of connections hence the
> intermittence.
>
> All works fine for me, but the boards are only a few feet away. Also I'm
> using IE rather than Firefox.
Reply by ●January 16, 20062006-01-16
Just a "me too", they all work fine for me (WinXP IE6) but they are
sloooowwww...
At 04:23 PM 1/16/2006, you wrote: > > > Here too.
> > > Win XP Pro.
> > > Firefox 1.5
> > >
> > > <http://82.32.114.142:47821/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://82.32.114.142:47821/>http://82.32.114.142:47821/
> > > http://82.32.114.142:47820/
> > > <http://82.32.114.142:47822/cgi/tcp" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://82.32.114.142:47822/cgi/tcp>http://82.32.114.142:47822/cgi/tcp
> > > http://82.32.114.142:47822/cgi/rtos
> > >
> > > all of them works fine.
> >
> >
> > Hmm. First round the second listed was giving me "The document contains
> > no data." After multiple tries through the list then the second worked
>and
> > the first start complaining. Are all of these running uIP I wonder?
> >
> > XP
> > Firefox 1.0.7 >The 47820 port is using a WizNET I2C interface.
>
>The 47821 is Pauls uIP demo bit banging a Crystal LAN running as a task
>under FreeRTOS (LPC).
>
>The 47822 is uIP running with interrupts and DMA on a SAM7X.
>
>The number of simultaneous connections is limited (#define in the code). If
>you look at a page that sends lots of small packets then each takes a
>connection. I imagine that posting the addresses here is generating several
>simulations hits, so maybe its just running out of connections hence the
>intermittence.
>
>All works fine for me, but the boards are only a few feet away. Also I'm
>using IE rather than Firefox.
>
>Regards,
>Richard.
>
><http://www.FreeRTOS.org" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.FreeRTOS.org>http://www.FreeRTOS.org >
>
>SPONSORED LINKS
><http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Microprocessor&w1=Microprocessor&w2=Microcontrollers&w3=Pic+microcontrollers&w451+microprocessor&c=4&s&.sig=tsVC-J9hJ5qyXg0WPR0l6g>Microprocessor
><http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Microcontrollers&w1=Microprocessor&w2=Microcontrollers&w3=Pic+microcontrollers&w451+microprocessor&c=4&s&.sig=DvJVNqC_pqRTm8Xq01nxwg>Microcontrollers
><http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Pic+microcontrollers&w1=Microprocessor&w2=Microcontrollers&w3=Pic+microcontrollers&w451+microprocessor&c=4&s&.sig=TpkoX4KofDJ7c6LyBvUqVQ>Pic
>microcontrollers
><http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k51+microprocessor&w1=Microprocessor&w2=Microcontrollers&w3=Pic+microcontrollers&w451+microprocessor&c=4&s&.sig=1Ipf1Fjfbd_HVIlekkDP-A>8051
>microprocessor >----------
>>Yahoo! Terms of Service. >----------
Reply by ●January 16, 20062006-01-16
> IE loads them fine on my machine. On the ones in question, in IE there
is
a
> delayed load between the header and body.
>
> It's a curious difference between Firefox and IE.
>
> A tracert of 82.32.114.142 results in over 30 network hops. This may have
a
> bearing on things. Are you in the UK? I'm in California.
Yep - UK - just a few thousand miles away.
Richard.
http://www.FreeRTOS.org
a
> delayed load between the header and body.
>
> It's a curious difference between Firefox and IE.
>
> A tracert of 82.32.114.142 results in over 30 network hops. This may have
a
> bearing on things. Are you in the UK? I'm in California.
Yep - UK - just a few thousand miles away.
Richard.
http://www.FreeRTOS.org
