I'm using CP2102 USB to UART bridges in my designs and I am able to
communicate very nicely with these devices. On some of my systems I
already have 4 coms ports + internal modem = COM1-COM5. When I plug in
my usb coms the pc creates coms ports above this from COM6 onwards.
By changing the ini file in TeraTerm I can get it to access ports other
than the default COM1-COM4 and that all works fine.
The problem is when I go to upload new firmware with the LPC2000 Flash
Utility, it only runs up to COM5 and there is no way of changing it.
At present I am forced to switch across to a laptop that doesn't have
any built in coms ports and is quite happy to have usb coms installed
from COM1-COM5.
Philips, can you please upgrade this utility to handle ports above COM5
for us coms port rich folks.
TIA,
*Peter*
LPC2000 Flash Utility Coms Ports > 5
Started by ●October 13, 2005
Reply by ●October 13, 20052005-10-13
Hi Peter
I also has this problem not only with the Philips flash software.
We soved this by overriding the settings in the windows device manager.
So f.e. com8 became com2 and vice versa.
Cheers
Michael >From: Peter Jakacki <peterjak@pete...>
>Reply-To: lpc2000@lpc2...
>To: lpc2000@lpc2...
>Subject: [lpc2000] LPC2000 Flash Utility Coms Ports > 5
>Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 17:34:45 +1000
>
>I'm using CP2102 USB to UART bridges in my designs and I am able to
>communicate very nicely with these devices. On some of my systems I
>already have 4 coms ports + internal modem = COM1-COM5. When I plug in
>my usb coms the pc creates coms ports above this from COM6 onwards.
>
>By changing the ini file in TeraTerm I can get it to access ports other
>than the default COM1-COM4 and that all works fine.
>
>The problem is when I go to upload new firmware with the LPC2000 Flash
>Utility, it only runs up to COM5 and there is no way of changing it.
>
>At present I am forced to switch across to a laptop that doesn't have
>any built in coms ports and is quite happy to have usb coms installed
>from COM1-COM5.
>
>Philips, can you please upgrade this utility to handle ports above COM5
>for us coms port rich folks.
>
>TIA,
>*Peter*
>
I also has this problem not only with the Philips flash software.
We soved this by overriding the settings in the windows device manager.
So f.e. com8 became com2 and vice versa.
Cheers
Michael >From: Peter Jakacki <peterjak@pete...>
>Reply-To: lpc2000@lpc2...
>To: lpc2000@lpc2...
>Subject: [lpc2000] LPC2000 Flash Utility Coms Ports > 5
>Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 17:34:45 +1000
>
>I'm using CP2102 USB to UART bridges in my designs and I am able to
>communicate very nicely with these devices. On some of my systems I
>already have 4 coms ports + internal modem = COM1-COM5. When I plug in
>my usb coms the pc creates coms ports above this from COM6 onwards.
>
>By changing the ini file in TeraTerm I can get it to access ports other
>than the default COM1-COM4 and that all works fine.
>
>The problem is when I go to upload new firmware with the LPC2000 Flash
>Utility, it only runs up to COM5 and there is no way of changing it.
>
>At present I am forced to switch across to a laptop that doesn't have
>any built in coms ports and is quite happy to have usb coms installed
>from COM1-COM5.
>
>Philips, can you please upgrade this utility to handle ports above COM5
>for us coms port rich folks.
>
>TIA,
>*Peter*
>
Reply by ●October 13, 20052005-10-13
Hi Peter
Try this
http://guest.engelschall.com/~martin/lpc21xx/isp/
This a command line tool, but very easy to use.
Tommy
Michael Rubitschka <rubitschka@rubi...> wrote
Hi Peter
I also has this problem not only with the Philips flash software.
We soved this by overriding the settings in the windows device manager.
So f.e. com8 became com2 and vice versa.
Cheers
Michael >From: Peter Jakacki <peterjak@pete...>
>Reply-To: lpc2000@lpc2...
>To: lpc2000@lpc2...
>Subject: [lpc2000] LPC2000 Flash Utility Coms Ports > 5
>Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 17:34:45 +1000
>
>I'm using CP2102 USB to UART bridges in my designs and I am able to
>communicate very nicely with these devices. On some of my systems I
>already have 4 coms ports + internal modem = COM1-COM5. When I plug in
>my usb coms the pc creates coms ports above this from COM6 onwards.
>
>By changing the ini file in TeraTerm I can get it to access ports other
>than the default COM1-COM4 and that all works fine.
>
>The problem is when I go to upload new firmware with the LPC2000 Flash
>Utility, it only runs up to COM5 and there is no way of changing it.
>
>At present I am forced to switch across to a laptop that doesn't have
>any built in coms ports and is quite happy to have usb coms installed
>from COM1-COM5.
>
>Philips, can you please upgrade this utility to handle ports above COM5
>for us coms port rich folks.
>
>TIA,
>*Peter*
>
SPONSORED LINKS
Microprocessor Microcontrollers Pic microcontrollers 8051 microprocessor
---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS ---------------------------------
---------------------------------
һʼɧbr /> ɱ
Try this
http://guest.engelschall.com/~martin/lpc21xx/isp/
This a command line tool, but very easy to use.
Tommy
Michael Rubitschka <rubitschka@rubi...> wrote
Hi Peter
I also has this problem not only with the Philips flash software.
We soved this by overriding the settings in the windows device manager.
So f.e. com8 became com2 and vice versa.
Cheers
Michael >From: Peter Jakacki <peterjak@pete...>
>Reply-To: lpc2000@lpc2...
>To: lpc2000@lpc2...
>Subject: [lpc2000] LPC2000 Flash Utility Coms Ports > 5
>Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 17:34:45 +1000
>
>I'm using CP2102 USB to UART bridges in my designs and I am able to
>communicate very nicely with these devices. On some of my systems I
>already have 4 coms ports + internal modem = COM1-COM5. When I plug in
>my usb coms the pc creates coms ports above this from COM6 onwards.
>
>By changing the ini file in TeraTerm I can get it to access ports other
>than the default COM1-COM4 and that all works fine.
>
>The problem is when I go to upload new firmware with the LPC2000 Flash
>Utility, it only runs up to COM5 and there is no way of changing it.
>
>At present I am forced to switch across to a laptop that doesn't have
>any built in coms ports and is quite happy to have usb coms installed
>from COM1-COM5.
>
>Philips, can you please upgrade this utility to handle ports above COM5
>for us coms port rich folks.
>
>TIA,
>*Peter*
>
SPONSORED LINKS
Microprocessor Microcontrollers Pic microcontrollers 8051 microprocessor
---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS ---------------------------------
---------------------------------
һʼɧbr /> ɱ
Reply by ●October 14, 20052005-10-14
Hi,
if you are running Linux try lpcflash4linux.
http://www.net-attack.de/?p=lpcflash&l=en
It is also a easy to use command line tool for Linux.
Sten
g pf wrote:
> Hi Peter
>
> Try this
>
> http://guest.engelschall.com/~martin/lpc21xx/isp/
>
> This a command line tool, but very easy to use.
>
> Tommy >
> Michael Rubitschka <rubitschka@rubi...> wrote
> Hi Peter
>
> I also has this problem not only with the Philips flash software.
> We soved this by overriding the settings in the windows device manager.
> So f.e. com8 became com2 and vice versa.
>
> Cheers
> Michael >
>>From: Peter Jakacki <peterjak@pete...>
>>Reply-To: lpc2000@lpc2...
>>To: lpc2000@lpc2...
>>Subject: [lpc2000] LPC2000 Flash Utility Coms Ports > 5
>>Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 17:34:45 +1000
>>
>>I'm using CP2102 USB to UART bridges in my designs and I am able to
>>communicate very nicely with these devices. On some of my systems I
>>already have 4 coms ports + internal modem = COM1-COM5. When I plug in
>>my usb coms the pc creates coms ports above this from COM6 onwards.
>>
>>By changing the ini file in TeraTerm I can get it to access ports other
>>than the default COM1-COM4 and that all works fine.
>>
>>The problem is when I go to upload new firmware with the LPC2000 Flash
>>Utility, it only runs up to COM5 and there is no way of changing it.
>>
>>At present I am forced to switch across to a laptop that doesn't have
>>any built in coms ports and is quite happy to have usb coms installed
>
>>from COM1-COM5.
>
>>Philips, can you please upgrade this utility to handle ports above COM5
>>for us coms port rich folks.
>>
>>TIA,
>>*Peter*
>
--
/************************************************
Do you need a tiny and efficient real time
operating system (RTOS) with a preemtive
multitasking for LPC2000 or AT91SAM7?
http://nanortos.net-attack.de/
Or some open-source tools and code for LPC2000?
http://www.net-attack.de/
************************************************/
if you are running Linux try lpcflash4linux.
http://www.net-attack.de/?p=lpcflash&l=en
It is also a easy to use command line tool for Linux.
Sten
g pf wrote:
> Hi Peter
>
> Try this
>
> http://guest.engelschall.com/~martin/lpc21xx/isp/
>
> This a command line tool, but very easy to use.
>
> Tommy >
> Michael Rubitschka <rubitschka@rubi...> wrote
> Hi Peter
>
> I also has this problem not only with the Philips flash software.
> We soved this by overriding the settings in the windows device manager.
> So f.e. com8 became com2 and vice versa.
>
> Cheers
> Michael >
>>From: Peter Jakacki <peterjak@pete...>
>>Reply-To: lpc2000@lpc2...
>>To: lpc2000@lpc2...
>>Subject: [lpc2000] LPC2000 Flash Utility Coms Ports > 5
>>Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 17:34:45 +1000
>>
>>I'm using CP2102 USB to UART bridges in my designs and I am able to
>>communicate very nicely with these devices. On some of my systems I
>>already have 4 coms ports + internal modem = COM1-COM5. When I plug in
>>my usb coms the pc creates coms ports above this from COM6 onwards.
>>
>>By changing the ini file in TeraTerm I can get it to access ports other
>>than the default COM1-COM4 and that all works fine.
>>
>>The problem is when I go to upload new firmware with the LPC2000 Flash
>>Utility, it only runs up to COM5 and there is no way of changing it.
>>
>>At present I am forced to switch across to a laptop that doesn't have
>>any built in coms ports and is quite happy to have usb coms installed
>
>>from COM1-COM5.
>
>>Philips, can you please upgrade this utility to handle ports above COM5
>>for us coms port rich folks.
>>
>>TIA,
>>*Peter*
>
--
/************************************************
Do you need a tiny and efficient real time
operating system (RTOS) with a preemtive
multitasking for LPC2000 or AT91SAM7?
http://nanortos.net-attack.de/
Or some open-source tools and code for LPC2000?
http://www.net-attack.de/
************************************************/
Reply by ●October 14, 20052005-10-14
> if you are running Linux try lpcflash4linux.
>
> http://www.net-attack.de/?p=lpcflash&l=en
The download links don't work?
>
> http://www.net-attack.de/?p=lpcflash&l=en
The download links don't work?
Reply by ●October 15, 20052005-10-15
Eric Engler wrote:
>>if you are running Linux try lpcflash4linux.
>>
>>http://www.net-attack.de/?p=lpcflash&l=en > The download links don't work?
>
Ooops! Fixed.
Thank you.
--
/************************************************
Do you need a tiny and efficient real time
operating system (RTOS) with a preemtive
multitasking for LPC2000 or AT91SAM7?
http://nanortos.net-attack.de/
Or some open-source tools and code for LPC2000?
http://www.net-attack.de/
************************************************/
>>if you are running Linux try lpcflash4linux.
>>
>>http://www.net-attack.de/?p=lpcflash&l=en > The download links don't work?
>
Ooops! Fixed.
Thank you.
--
/************************************************
Do you need a tiny and efficient real time
operating system (RTOS) with a preemtive
multitasking for LPC2000 or AT91SAM7?
http://nanortos.net-attack.de/
Or some open-source tools and code for LPC2000?
http://www.net-attack.de/
************************************************/
Reply by ●October 15, 20052005-10-15
Hi Sten,
I have seen your nanoRTOS
(http://www.net-attack.de/products/nanortos/2.0/) and I have a question
about debugging: how have you debugged this OS (or other things) with
GNU tools (gcc & gdb)?
Are you able to use a JTAG interface with gdb, use a commercial tool or
via printf messages?
I have seen your nanoRTOS
(http://www.net-attack.de/products/nanortos/2.0/) and I have a question
about debugging: how have you debugged this OS (or other things) with
GNU tools (gcc & gdb)?
Are you able to use a JTAG interface with gdb, use a commercial tool or
via printf messages?
Reply by ●October 16, 20052005-10-16
FabioDB wrote:
> Hi Sten,
>
> I have seen your nanoRTOS
> (http://www.net-attack.de/products/nanortos/2.0/) and I have a question
> about debugging: how have you debugged this OS (or other things) with
> GNU tools (gcc & gdb)?
> Are you able to use a JTAG interface with gdb, use a commercial tool or
> via printf messages?
>
Hi,
debugging under Linux is a little bit tricky. With a friend of mine
(www.section5.ch) we are working on a low-cost version of a JTAG
debugger working with gdb to provide a better open-source solution for
debugging. But you can also use non-low-cost commercial tools like
BDI2000 (about 2500Euro) from Abatron to debug ARM architectures with
gdb. But all these tools only provide source-code debugging not a real
OS-based debugging.
At the moment I'm mostly debugging with a UART and some LEDs. You can
compile nanoRTOS with a debug-monitor which provides a panic console on
a UART similar to a kernel panic under Linux. It dumps registers, top of
stack of latest running task, information about current state of the
kernel, a list of tasks of each task queue and a list of all memory
frames from dynamic memory managment. This panic is issued for example
if a very nasty interrupt (illegal instruction, data or prefetch abort)
occurs or if the system enters a absolutely non-recoverable state (e.g.
dynamic memory managment has been corrupted by a task, internal kernel
structures has been destroyed/overwritten, ...). This "dump"-functions
can be used for "manually" triggered dumps for debugging the system, too.
In addition you have the possibility to compile nanoRTOS with various
additional development features like stack-watch (to observe stack usage
of tasks for profiling or identifcation for dynamic memory corruptions)
or paranoid checking of pointers or internals. Features you may not need
in a software release.
In contrast to other RTOSs out there nanoRTOS has not been designed
under focus of theoretical computer science. It has been grown up from
several of my (real) projects in the last two years under focus of
performance, efficency and relaibility. I'm only an engineer for
micro-electronic with a great fetish for software.
Comments or new ideas would be appreciated!
Regards,
Sten
PS: Next time I will release a new version with some new features and
modules!
--
/************************************************
Do you need a tiny and efficient real time
operating system (RTOS) with a preemtive
multitasking for LPC2000 or AT91SAM7?
http://nanortos.net-attack.de/
Or some open-source tools and code for LPC2000?
http://www.net-attack.de/
************************************************/
> Hi Sten,
>
> I have seen your nanoRTOS
> (http://www.net-attack.de/products/nanortos/2.0/) and I have a question
> about debugging: how have you debugged this OS (or other things) with
> GNU tools (gcc & gdb)?
> Are you able to use a JTAG interface with gdb, use a commercial tool or
> via printf messages?
>
Hi,
debugging under Linux is a little bit tricky. With a friend of mine
(www.section5.ch) we are working on a low-cost version of a JTAG
debugger working with gdb to provide a better open-source solution for
debugging. But you can also use non-low-cost commercial tools like
BDI2000 (about 2500Euro) from Abatron to debug ARM architectures with
gdb. But all these tools only provide source-code debugging not a real
OS-based debugging.
At the moment I'm mostly debugging with a UART and some LEDs. You can
compile nanoRTOS with a debug-monitor which provides a panic console on
a UART similar to a kernel panic under Linux. It dumps registers, top of
stack of latest running task, information about current state of the
kernel, a list of tasks of each task queue and a list of all memory
frames from dynamic memory managment. This panic is issued for example
if a very nasty interrupt (illegal instruction, data or prefetch abort)
occurs or if the system enters a absolutely non-recoverable state (e.g.
dynamic memory managment has been corrupted by a task, internal kernel
structures has been destroyed/overwritten, ...). This "dump"-functions
can be used for "manually" triggered dumps for debugging the system, too.
In addition you have the possibility to compile nanoRTOS with various
additional development features like stack-watch (to observe stack usage
of tasks for profiling or identifcation for dynamic memory corruptions)
or paranoid checking of pointers or internals. Features you may not need
in a software release.
In contrast to other RTOSs out there nanoRTOS has not been designed
under focus of theoretical computer science. It has been grown up from
several of my (real) projects in the last two years under focus of
performance, efficency and relaibility. I'm only an engineer for
micro-electronic with a great fetish for software.
Comments or new ideas would be appreciated!
Regards,
Sten
PS: Next time I will release a new version with some new features and
modules!
--
/************************************************
Do you need a tiny and efficient real time
operating system (RTOS) with a preemtive
multitasking for LPC2000 or AT91SAM7?
http://nanortos.net-attack.de/
Or some open-source tools and code for LPC2000?
http://www.net-attack.de/
************************************************/
