And said compiler vendor now added an option to not use the fix (for when and if the hardware fix comes). Michel --- In msp430@msp4..., "Wolfgang Reich" <reich_wolfgang@...> wrote: > > --- In msp430@msp4..., "Paul Curtis" <plc@> wrote: > > > > > There is also this nasty little CPU bug called "CPU 6" in the > > > MSP430F21x1 (see errata sheet slaz020.pdf - BTW: is your > > > compiler/assembler aware of this bug?). It affects ADD > instructions > > > with indirect addressing, like ADD @R14,R14, executed after RET > or > > > RETI. > > > > Word from TI is that the next batch of 21x1s will have this bug > > corrected. > > Yes, TI told us it'll be fixed in rev E, but also that for the next > few months we'd still get rev D from the distris. > We made some prototypes with rev D MSP430F2121, and it's not sure > that we'll get rev. E by the time we go into production, so we needed > a workaround for this bug - and we got it from our compiler vendor > within very short time :-) > > Wolfgang > > "Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level and > then beat you with experience." (Dilbert) >
interrupt-code execution during flash-erase.
Started by ●March 6, 2006
Reply by ●March 7, 20062006-03-07