Hi all, There are so many C compilers around and I am looking for the cheapest and most effective product . Is there anyone who has a chart or something like that shows the performance and prices of these compilers ? Also some internet adresses of free C compilers would be very helpful . Best Regards CEM
MSP430 C Compiler-Debugger Performance
Started by ●November 8, 2003
Reply by ●November 12, 20032003-11-12
Hi all, There are so many C compilers around and I am looking for the cheapest and most effective product . Is there anyone who has a chart or something like that shows the performance and prices of these compilers ? Also some internet adresses of free C compilers would be very helpful . Best Regards CEM
Reply by ●November 12, 20032003-11-12
> Also some internet adresses of free C compilers would be very helpful . The problem with free compilers (at least in MSP430-land) is that they're worth every penny. There aren't many choices for MSP430 C compilers. JJS
Reply by ●November 12, 20032003-11-12
If you think GCC is worthless, you're sadly misinformed. GCC works
well, and
we've shipped 5 products based on it (moderate complexity, not just blink
the
LED).
I've not used the ImageCraft MSP430 compiler, but I do use them for my AVR
products. They're quite good, and Richard provides excellent support. If
I
weren't using GCC already, I'd have no hesitation using ICC.
Don't know about any of the others ones out there.
--John
On Wednesday 12 November 2003 13:49 pm, John Speth
wrote:
> > Also some internet adresses of free C compilers would be very
>
> helpful .
>
> The problem with free compilers (at least in MSP430-land) is that
> they're worth every penny. There aren't many choices for MSP430
C
> compilers.
>
> JJS
Reply by ●November 12, 20032003-11-12
> > Also some internet adresses of free C compilers would be very > helpful . > > The problem with free compilers (at least in MSP430-land) is that > they're worth every penny. There aren't many choices for MSP430 C > compilers. I happen to think the MSP430 is pretty well endowed with good compilers. IMO, MSP430 is in a better position with quality compilers than AVR, but that's my next move. -- Paul Curtis, Rowley Associates Ltd http://www.rowley.co.uk CrossWorks for MSP430 and ARM processors
Reply by ●November 12, 20032003-11-12
Hi Paul. Though I really enjoy your compiler I must tell you that Codevision AVR written by Pavel is a REALLY good compiler for the AVR. Just so that you don't think it's a compleatly new market. Pavel support is terrific and so is his compiler, so don't underestimate it. If you wan't to take some of the AVR compilermarket you should try to get JTAG debuging going (like you have on the MSP430) since ATMELs avrstudio seems dead in the water(no new verisons the last 1,5 year or so). Good luck Jimmy Pedersen ----- Original Message ----- From: Paul Curtis To: msp430@msp4... Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 9:19 PM Subject: RE: [msp430] Re: MSP430 C Compiler-Debugger Performance > > Also some internet adresses of free C compilers would be very > helpful . > > The problem with free compilers (at least in MSP430-land) is that > they're worth every penny. There aren't many choices for MSP430 C > compilers. I happen to think the MSP430 is pretty well endowed with good compilers. IMO, MSP430 is in a better position with quality compilers than AVR, but that's my next move. -- Paul Curtis, Rowley Associates Ltd http://www.rowley.co.uk CrossWorks for MSP430 and ARM processors .
Reply by ●November 12, 20032003-11-12
Hi Jimmy, > Though I really enjoy your compiler I must tell you that > Codevision AVR written by Pavel is a REALLY good compiler for > the AVR. Just so that you don't think it's a compleatly new > market. Pavel support is terrific and so is his compiler, so > don't underestimate it. > If you wan't to take some of the AVR compilermarket you > should try to get JTAG debuging going (like you have on the > MSP430) since ATMELs avrstudio seems dead in the water(no new > verisons the last 1,5 year or so). One of the things I do before undertaking a compiler project is to assess the competition, especially code generation. Although CodeVisionAVR is good, our object code format and latest linker technology (which I'm completing for the MSP) will make our system very competetive on AVR. I already have the JTAG ICE, and C code is running in AVR Studio. I don't think AVR Studio is particularly inspiring as a development environment, but it has excellent device emulation. We'll also be providing a USB to JTAG emulator/ISP for the AVR just like we've done for the MSP. IAR have a good compiler for AVR, but we think we can offer a nice IDE with a good compiler at a reasonable price. But this is an MSP430 conference... ;-) -- Paul Curtis, Rowley Associates Ltd http://www.rowley.co.uk CrossWorks for MSP430 and ARM processors