You can generate preprocessor output to check what source the compiler tries to compile and where the problem is. I never used msp430 tools, only Sitara MCUs with...

It's MSP430, not MPS430.1. Where and how is the symbol F_CPU defined?2. Where and how is the symbol DC0CTL defined? There are two symbols, DC0CTL and DCOCTL.3. Are...

> It's not a Windows limitation.It is essentially Windows limitation that it can not format 64GB card to 8GB FAT32 card.

I wouldn't rely on MS as your trusted long-term partner in the world of embedded development. Nothing can stop them from dropping support of any FAT altogether in...

Can your customer with 64GB card (or 512GB in two years time) format it to 2GB (or less) with FAT32?

In the current state, I don't see how you program can even be built. You declare static functions but don't define them. The linker should scream.

You don't even need memcpy and sizeof. The following will do it for you:#include ...void main (void){    WrkSettings = DefSettings;}Advantage: just one line of...

You are welcome!

Can you try it this way:Settings DefSettings = {    .vds = {        .vdMagicNum    = 0x42,        .vdVersionNum  = 0x11,        .vdTime       ...

The first error (well, the second) I get with arm-none-eabi-gcc is: init.c:24:1: error: unknown type name 'Settings'; use 'union' keyword to refer to the type  ...

Have a look at gcc-arm-none-eabi. I've got the following V5TE-related files:~/bin/gcc-arm-none-eabi-9-2020-q2-update/lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/9.3.1/arm/v5te/hard/crtn.o~/bin/gcc-arm-none-eabi-9-2020-q2-update/lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/9.3.1/arm/v5te/hard/crtfastmath.o~/bin/gcc-arm-none-eabi-9-2020-q2-update/lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/9.3.1/arm/v5te/hard/crtend.o~/bin/gcc-arm-none-eabi-9-2020-q2-update/lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/9.3.1/arm/v5te/hard/crti.o~/bin/gcc-arm-none-eabi-9-2020-q2-update/lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/9.3.1/arm/v5te/hard/crtbegin.o~/bin/gcc-arm-none-eabi-9-2020-q2-update/lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/9.3.1/arm/v5te/softfp/crtn.o~/bin/gcc-arm-none-eabi-9-2020-q2-update/lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/9.3.1/arm/v5te/softfp/crtfastmath.o~/bin/gcc-arm-none-eabi-9-2020-q2-update/lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/9.3.1/arm/v5te/softfp/crtend.o~/bin/gcc-arm-none-eabi-9-2020-q2-update/lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/9.3.1/arm/v5te/softfp/crti.o~/bin/gcc-arm-none-eabi-9-2020-q2-update/lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/9.3.1/arm/v5te/softfp/crtbegin.o~/bin/gcc-arm-none-eabi-9-2020-q2-update/arm-none-eabi/lib/arm/v5te/hard/crt0.o~/bin/gcc-arm-none-eabi-9-2020-q2-update/arm-none-eabi/lib/arm/v5te/softfp/crt0.oEDIT:...

There is no need to reinvent the wheel (device drivers) time after time. You would be more interested in the bio-logic of your device, rather then in fiddling with...

Ask your team a few questions:struct2 is declared global, while struct1 is accessed via the pointer. Why this way and not vice versa?Imagine, you've got 17 data...

1. Your code example will not compile.2. You are passing an address of a global structure. Ok, modify whatever you need via the pointer, and return nothing from...

> This is a 3-core processor and an array is set up in a shared memory.Then, there should be a mailbox structure of some sort for inter-core communication, and...