--- In l..., Paul Curtis wrote:
> >
> > The total count is nine post including the one I made today, does this
create so much "noise" as noltstein puts it?
>
> I think you're missing the point that you have done (effectively) one
announcement per week for the last month. The frequency of announcements is
increasing and, if you keep fixing and enhancing, one can only assume the
announcement frequency will remain once a week during development...
>
I agree with Paul. Consider what this group would be like if *all* of us who are
developing tools were to post announcements here every time we had a minor
upgrade. As a developer myself I understand the excitement of creating something
new and wanting to tell everybody about it. However, I also appreciate that not
everybody might be excited about it as I am.
It is not only the frequency of the announcements that are irritating - it is
also the fact that they are duplicated in other forums that I monitor (e.g.
SparkFun).
Please don't take the advice personally and go off sulking in a corner.
Just find out who is really interested in your work and find an alternative way
to keep them informed of what you are doing and let the rest of us know when you
have something really significant to announce. I wouldn't expect this to be
more than every three months,
P.S. We recently released a free 'Starter Edition' of Astrobe for
Cortex-M3. I have refrained from announcing this before in this newgroup as I
didn't want to upset anybody ;-)
Regards,
Chris
Chris Burrows
CFB Software
http://www.astrobe.com
ARMwizard V3.1.0 update
Started by ●May 25, 2012
Reply by ●May 25, 20122012-05-25
Reply by ●May 26, 20122012-05-26
As a slightly different view on this, I would expect we would all have some
benefit out of might come phrased as:
"While developing version X I found that the documentation is
wrong/inaccurate and you need to do Blah versus what is written"
OR
"I found during the development of version X that Y had issues/did not
work/was a lot more complicated than expected and this group may now benefit
from my time .."
To me, that's the kind of sharing that helps us all because one day we may
be struggling with the same issue.
.Laurie:{)
From: l... [mailto:l...] On Behalf Of
cfbsoftware1
Sent: Saturday, 26 May 2012 9:53 AM
To: l...
Subject: [lpc2000] Re: ARMwizard V3.1.0 update
--- In l... , Paul
Curtis wrote:
> >
> > The total count is nine post including the one I made today, does this
create so much "noise" as noltstein puts it?
>
> I think you're missing the point that you have done (effectively) one
announcement per week for the last month. The frequency of announcements is
increasing and, if you keep fixing and enhancing, one can only assume the
announcement frequency will remain once a week during development...
>
I agree with Paul. Consider what this group would be like if *all* of us who
are developing tools were to post announcements here every time we had a
minor upgrade. As a developer myself I understand the excitement of creating
something new and wanting to tell everybody about it. However, I also
appreciate that not everybody might be excited about it as I am.
It is not only the frequency of the announcements that are irritating - it
is also the fact that they are duplicated in other forums that I monitor
(e.g. SparkFun).
Please don't take the advice personally and go off sulking in a corner. Just
find out who is really interested in your work and find an alternative way
to keep them informed of what you are doing and let the rest of us know when
you have something really significant to announce. I wouldn't expect this to
be more than every three months,
P.S. We recently released a free 'Starter Edition' of Astrobe for Cortex-M3.
I have refrained from announcing this before in this newgroup as I didn't
want to upset anybody ;-)
Regards,
Chris
Chris Burrows
CFB Software
http://www.astrobe.com
benefit out of might come phrased as:
"While developing version X I found that the documentation is
wrong/inaccurate and you need to do Blah versus what is written"
OR
"I found during the development of version X that Y had issues/did not
work/was a lot more complicated than expected and this group may now benefit
from my time .."
To me, that's the kind of sharing that helps us all because one day we may
be struggling with the same issue.
.Laurie:{)
From: l... [mailto:l...] On Behalf Of
cfbsoftware1
Sent: Saturday, 26 May 2012 9:53 AM
To: l...
Subject: [lpc2000] Re: ARMwizard V3.1.0 update
--- In l... , Paul
Curtis wrote:
> >
> > The total count is nine post including the one I made today, does this
create so much "noise" as noltstein puts it?
>
> I think you're missing the point that you have done (effectively) one
announcement per week for the last month. The frequency of announcements is
increasing and, if you keep fixing and enhancing, one can only assume the
announcement frequency will remain once a week during development...
>
I agree with Paul. Consider what this group would be like if *all* of us who
are developing tools were to post announcements here every time we had a
minor upgrade. As a developer myself I understand the excitement of creating
something new and wanting to tell everybody about it. However, I also
appreciate that not everybody might be excited about it as I am.
It is not only the frequency of the announcements that are irritating - it
is also the fact that they are duplicated in other forums that I monitor
(e.g. SparkFun).
Please don't take the advice personally and go off sulking in a corner. Just
find out who is really interested in your work and find an alternative way
to keep them informed of what you are doing and let the rest of us know when
you have something really significant to announce. I wouldn't expect this to
be more than every three months,
P.S. We recently released a free 'Starter Edition' of Astrobe for Cortex-M3.
I have refrained from announcing this before in this newgroup as I didn't
want to upset anybody ;-)
Regards,
Chris
Chris Burrows
CFB Software
http://www.astrobe.com
Reply by ●May 26, 20122012-05-26
Hi,
I think this theme needs to end now - we have had more emails pro and
contra on this theme than the number of update messages.
As far a I am concerned, he should be able to send update messages
...Alex is working on this project for the LPC group as a whole
and not charging for it. I wish to thank him for his effort and commend
his initiative, Well done Alex.
If one is not interested in the Wizard the just delete the email.
BD
I think this theme needs to end now - we have had more emails pro and
contra on this theme than the number of update messages.
As far a I am concerned, he should be able to send update messages
...Alex is working on this project for the LPC group as a whole
and not charging for it. I wish to thank him for his effort and commend
his initiative, Well done Alex.
If one is not interested in the Wizard the just delete the email.
BD
Reply by ●May 26, 20122012-05-26
Alex: very nice work dude! , im sure you have a lot of support from the majority
of people in this forum, and every news you release are expected and followed
closely. please keep us informed!
Paul: are you serious? This guy is making a good contribution to everyone, same as you do frequently but this just seems like an attack on a "rival company", despict the fact that its not. Also not very happy with this stone throwing in the first place and then justify yourserlf with an "I was just saying" attitude. Not nice at all
Nobody can for sure decide on what is and whats not a contribution, at least while we stay on topic
--- In l..., "Alexan_e" wrote:
>
> What is new in v3.1.0
>
> . Fixed: The max operating frequency for the ADC peripheral in LPC175x/6x was 14MHz instead of 13MHz [nxp41306 in LPCware.com]
> . Fixed: In the interrupt initalization of Cortex M0 the priority setting is now placed before enabling the interrupt.
> . Fixed: The Interrupt priority comment was wrong, the priority level for CortexM0 is 0(highest) to 3(lowest).
> . Added profiles for LPC11xx_(33p) LPC11xx33/101, LPC11xx33/201, LPC11xx33/301 (33 pin)
> . Added profiles for LPC11xx_(48p) LPC11xx48/101, LPC11xx48/201, LPC11xx48/301 (48 pin)
> . Added profiles for LPC11Lxx_(33p) LPC11xx33/102, LPC11xx33/202, LPC11xx33/302 (33 pin)
> . Added profiles for LPC11Lxx_(48p) LPC11xx48/102, LPC11xx48/202, LPC11xx48/302 (48 pin)
> . Added profiles for LPC11XLxx_(33p) LPC11xx33/103, LPC11xx33/203, LPC11xx33/303, LPC11xx33/323, LPC11xx33/333 (33 pin)
> . Added profiles for LPC11XLxx_(48p) LPC11xx48/103, LPC11xx48/203, LPC11xx48/303, LPC11xx48/323, LPC11xx48/333 (48 pin)
> . Added profiles for LPC11C12_14_(48p) LPC11C12, LPC11C14 (48 pin)
> . Added profiles for LPC11C22_24_(48p) LPC11C22, LPC11C24 (48 pin)
> . Added profiles for LPC11Exx_(33p) LPC11E11, LPC11E14 (33 pin)
> . Added profiles for LPC11Exx_(48p) LPC11E12, LPC11E13, LPC11E14 (48 pin)
> . Added profiles for LPC11Exx_(64p) LPC11E14 (64 pin)
> . Added profile for mbed LPC11U24 board (LPC11U24_MBED) including an image with the board pinout.The Led pins (0.8, 0.9, 0.10, 0.11) are set as output only and the two UART pins (0.18, 0.19) connected internally to the USB uart emulator are inputs with only the uart alternative function available. I have also removed the OD, HYS, INV and pull up/down modes from these pins.
>
> Visit http://alexan.edaboard.eu
>
> Best regards
> Alex
>
>
>
Paul: are you serious? This guy is making a good contribution to everyone, same as you do frequently but this just seems like an attack on a "rival company", despict the fact that its not. Also not very happy with this stone throwing in the first place and then justify yourserlf with an "I was just saying" attitude. Not nice at all
Nobody can for sure decide on what is and whats not a contribution, at least while we stay on topic
--- In l..., "Alexan_e" wrote:
>
> What is new in v3.1.0
>
> . Fixed: The max operating frequency for the ADC peripheral in LPC175x/6x was 14MHz instead of 13MHz [nxp41306 in LPCware.com]
> . Fixed: In the interrupt initalization of Cortex M0 the priority setting is now placed before enabling the interrupt.
> . Fixed: The Interrupt priority comment was wrong, the priority level for CortexM0 is 0(highest) to 3(lowest).
> . Added profiles for LPC11xx_(33p) LPC11xx33/101, LPC11xx33/201, LPC11xx33/301 (33 pin)
> . Added profiles for LPC11xx_(48p) LPC11xx48/101, LPC11xx48/201, LPC11xx48/301 (48 pin)
> . Added profiles for LPC11Lxx_(33p) LPC11xx33/102, LPC11xx33/202, LPC11xx33/302 (33 pin)
> . Added profiles for LPC11Lxx_(48p) LPC11xx48/102, LPC11xx48/202, LPC11xx48/302 (48 pin)
> . Added profiles for LPC11XLxx_(33p) LPC11xx33/103, LPC11xx33/203, LPC11xx33/303, LPC11xx33/323, LPC11xx33/333 (33 pin)
> . Added profiles for LPC11XLxx_(48p) LPC11xx48/103, LPC11xx48/203, LPC11xx48/303, LPC11xx48/323, LPC11xx48/333 (48 pin)
> . Added profiles for LPC11C12_14_(48p) LPC11C12, LPC11C14 (48 pin)
> . Added profiles for LPC11C22_24_(48p) LPC11C22, LPC11C24 (48 pin)
> . Added profiles for LPC11Exx_(33p) LPC11E11, LPC11E14 (33 pin)
> . Added profiles for LPC11Exx_(48p) LPC11E12, LPC11E13, LPC11E14 (48 pin)
> . Added profiles for LPC11Exx_(64p) LPC11E14 (64 pin)
> . Added profile for mbed LPC11U24 board (LPC11U24_MBED) including an image with the board pinout.The Led pins (0.8, 0.9, 0.10, 0.11) are set as output only and the two UART pins (0.18, 0.19) connected internally to the USB uart emulator are inputs with only the uart alternative function available. I have also removed the OD, HYS, INV and pull up/down modes from these pins.
>
> Visit http://alexan.edaboard.eu
>
> Best regards
> Alex
>
>
>
Reply by ●May 26, 20122012-05-26
I want to thank everyone who has shared his thoughts in this thread.
As far as I'm concerned the subject is closed so please lets move on because this conversation is starting to create some tension
between us which may even turn into an argument and I really don't want to be the cause of that.
Lets move back to what we are here for, out love/passion/joy for electronics.
Please let this be the last post of this thread.
Thank you
Alex
As far as I'm concerned the subject is closed so please lets move on because this conversation is starting to create some tension
between us which may even turn into an argument and I really don't want to be the cause of that.
Lets move back to what we are here for, out love/passion/joy for electronics.
Please let this be the last post of this thread.
Thank you
Alex
Reply by ●May 27, 20122012-05-27
On 26 May 2012, at 20:50, p...@yahoo.com wrote:
> Alex: very nice work dude! , im sure you have a lot of support from the majority of people in this forum,
There is no basis for this statement unless you have privately polled every single member.
> and every news you release are expected and followed closely. please keep us informed!
>
Sure, that can happen, but why not simply advertise the RSS feed? Otherwise, why provide an RSS feed?
> Paul: are you serious?
Yes.
> This guy is making a good contribution to everyone, same as you do frequently but this just seems like an attack on a "rival company", despict the fact that its not.
What's wrong with requesting simply to conform to well-defined newsgroup and mailing list announcement etiquette?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Announcement_(computing)
> Also not very happy with this stone throwing in the first place and then justify yourserlf with an "I was just saying" attitude. Not nice at all
Holy crap. Did you read what I originally wrote? Or did you stop reading before you got to the end?
>
> Nobody can for sure decide on what is and whats not a contribution, at least while we stay on topic
>
You have now made it clear what your position is. I have no idea what point your sentence is supposed to make.
-- Paul.
> Alex: very nice work dude! , im sure you have a lot of support from the majority of people in this forum,
There is no basis for this statement unless you have privately polled every single member.
> and every news you release are expected and followed closely. please keep us informed!
>
Sure, that can happen, but why not simply advertise the RSS feed? Otherwise, why provide an RSS feed?
> Paul: are you serious?
Yes.
> This guy is making a good contribution to everyone, same as you do frequently but this just seems like an attack on a "rival company", despict the fact that its not.
What's wrong with requesting simply to conform to well-defined newsgroup and mailing list announcement etiquette?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Announcement_(computing)
> Also not very happy with this stone throwing in the first place and then justify yourserlf with an "I was just saying" attitude. Not nice at all
Holy crap. Did you read what I originally wrote? Or did you stop reading before you got to the end?
>
> Nobody can for sure decide on what is and whats not a contribution, at least while we stay on topic
>
You have now made it clear what your position is. I have no idea what point your sentence is supposed to make.
-- Paul.
