EmbeddedRelated.com
Forums

I asked this before about 8051 core chips

Started by justme December 21, 2010
Larwe,

You are not contributing anything except smart-assed remarks.  You
have yet to suggest a chip or more.

How much nice it would have been to say something along the order of
this:

'Glad to see one coming back to microcpntrollers.  You may be
interested in the following chip:   xxxxxx, xxxxxxx or xxxxxxxxx. They
have most, if not all of what you are looking for.
Please let me know if I can be of further help'

Above is being helpful and polite.  You are just being a little shit.

Now, run along.

Joe

On Thu, 23 Dec 2010 09:21:47 -0800 (PST), larwe <zwsdotcom@gmail.com>
wrote:

>On Dec 23, 12:12&#4294967295;am, justme <jble...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Wrong. &#4294967295;Think again. > >Call back when you have a clue. The fact that everyone is telling you >"go ARM" should mean something.
Thanks, Neil, I will check those out.

For some odd reason, I cannot log on/register to 8052.com.

Joe

On Thu, 23 Dec 2010 01:22:29 -0500, Neil <NeilKurzm@worldnet.att.net>
wrote:

>On 12/21/2010 7:16 PM, justme wrote: >> You-all came through. However, I was overwhelmed yet, I still haven't >> found what I need. >> >> I am looking for an 8051 uc that has lots of flash and lots of ram and >> an internal rtc and some a/d and d/a. SPI and I2C would be very nice. >> I took a hiatus when the 89c668/9 series was in vogue and now, it >> doesn't SEEM like there has been a huge amount of new versions. >> >> Where am I going wrong? >> >> Thank you. >> >Try SIlabs or Analog Devices. >www.8052.com maybe a better place to ask the question.
Arm suggestions, Linnix?

Thanks

On Wed, 22 Dec 2010 08:03:52 -0800 (PST), linnix
<me@linnix.info-for.us> wrote:

>On Dec 22, 3:27&#4294967295;am, malcolm <malcolm...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Dec 22, 1:16&#4294967295;pm, justme <jble...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > You-all came through. &#4294967295;However, I was overwhelmed yet, I still haven't >> > found what I need. >> >> > I am looking for an 8051 uc that has lots of flash and lots of ram and >> > an internal rtc and some a/d and d/a. &#4294967295;SPI and I2C would be very nice. >> > I took a hiatus when the 89c668/9 series was in vogue and now, it >> > doesn't SEEM like there has been a huge amount of new versions. >> >> > Where am I going wrong? >> >> > Thank you. >> >> Well, you did not put any numbers, so we have no idea what your " lots >> of flash and lots of ram " actually means. > >89c668/9 are 64K flash, 8K sram. > >> >> ASIX have some large (up to 1MB FLASH, dual core) 8051 large address >> variants. > >I hope he is not programming 1MB in assembler. > >> >> http://www.asix.com.tw/ >> >> From SiLabs, there are parts up to 128KF : C8051F58x series. >> >> At large memory, 8051 are thin on the ground. > >If you are not programming in assembler, which bother with 20 years >old comp.arch.history. These high end 8051s are not very popular, >because they cost an arm and a leg. So, why not get the arm. >
Malcolm,

You bet it helps.  That ASIX series is something although, I didn't
see a rtc onboard.

Joe

On Wed, 22 Dec 2010 03:27:47 -0800 (PST), malcolm
<malcolm132@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Dec 22, 1:16&#4294967295;pm, justme <jble...@gmail.com> wrote: >> You-all came through. &#4294967295;However, I was overwhelmed yet, I still haven't >> found what I need. >> >> I am looking for an 8051 uc that has lots of flash and lots of ram and >> an internal rtc and some a/d and d/a. &#4294967295;SPI and I2C would be very nice. >> I took a hiatus when the 89c668/9 series was in vogue and now, it >> doesn't SEEM like there has been a huge amount of new versions. >> >> Where am I going wrong? >> >> Thank you. > >Well, you did not put any numbers, so we have no idea what your " lots >of flash and lots of ram " actually means. > >ASIX have some large (up to 1MB FLASH, dual core) 8051 large address >variants. > >http://www.asix.com.tw/ > >From SiLabs, there are parts up to 128KF : C8051F58x series. > >At large memory, 8051 are thin on the ground. > >hth
Okay, Rocky.

I will check that out.

Thank you.


On Wed, 22 Dec 2010 04:30:41 -0800 (PST), Rocky <robertgush@gmail.com>
wrote:

>On Dec 22, 1:27&#4294967295;pm, malcolm <malcolm...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Dec 22, 1:16&#4294967295;pm, justme <jble...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > You-all came through. &#4294967295;However, I was overwhelmed yet, I still haven't >> > found what I need. >> >> > I am looking for an 8051 uc that has lots of flash and lots of ram and >> > an internal rtc and some a/d and d/a. &#4294967295;SPI and I2C would be very nice. >> > I took a hiatus when the 89c668/9 series was in vogue and now, it >> > doesn't SEEM like there has been a huge amount of new versions. >> >> > Where am I going wrong? >> >> > Thank you. >> >> Well, you did not put any numbers, so we have no idea what your " lots >> of flash and lots of ram " actually means. >> >> ASIX have some large (up to 1MB FLASH, dual core) 8051 large address >> variants. >> >> http://www.asix.com.tw/ >> >Wiznet also have some part with quite a lot of flash and ram. And a >built >in h/w IP stack
On Dec 24, 10:25=A0am, justme <jble...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Malcolm, > > You bet it helps. =A0That ASIX series is something although, I didn't > see a rtc onboard. > > Joe
? The new family, AX220xx_Brief.pdf says : ["Integrates 32.768KHz crystal oscillator IO (with independent power input) for RTC and auto-wakeup timer of Wi-Fi power saving mode"] You can always add one, (easier than adding Code memory) and I see NXP have some TCXO modules now... PFX2127.PCF2129, for more precise RTCs hth
On 23.12.2010 22:19, justme wrote:

> You are not contributing anything except smart-assed remarks.
... says the same guy whose previous comment in this very thread consisted of a smart-assed one-liner that contributed exactly nothing to anything. You need to get a grip, man. > You have yet to suggest a chip or more. Nobody _has_to_ do anything here. You have no contract with any of us telling us what we have to do. And the way you're behaving yourself doesn't really improve people's wish to help you, either.
On 12/23/2010 4:22 PM, justme wrote:
> Thanks, Neil, I will check those out. > > For some odd reason, I cannot log on/register to 8052.com. > > Joe > > On Thu, 23 Dec 2010 01:22:29 -0500, Neil<NeilKurzm@worldnet.att.net> > wrote: > >> On 12/21/2010 7:16 PM, justme wrote: >>> You-all came through. However, I was overwhelmed yet, I still haven't >>> found what I need. >>> >>> I am looking for an 8051 uc that has lots of flash and lots of ram and >>> an internal rtc and some a/d and d/a. SPI and I2C would be very nice. >>> I took a hiatus when the 89c668/9 series was in vogue and now, it >>> doesn't SEEM like there has been a huge amount of new versions. >>> >>> Where am I going wrong? >>> >>> Thank you. >>> >> Try SIlabs or Analog Devices. >> www.8052.com maybe a better place to ask the question.
Not sure why try and email them. Keil.com has a 8052 core search tool. Note that everything it lists is still in production.
On 23/12/10 22:19, justme wrote:
> Larwe, > > You are not contributing anything except smart-assed remarks. You > have yet to suggest a chip or more. > > How much nice it would have been to say something along the order of > this: > > 'Glad to see one coming back to microcpntrollers. You may be > interested in the following chip: xxxxxx, xxxxxxx or xxxxxxxxx. They > have most, if not all of what you are looking for. > Please let me know if I can be of further help' > > Above is being helpful and polite. You are just being a little shit. > > Now, run along. > > Joe >
You may want to re-read Lewin's posts and your replies - perhaps you will realize who is being impolite, and apologise. If you want to be able to demand answers, find some paid consultant to provide it. Of course, they would then drop you as a customer after your outburst here. You might also want to look at some of the archives for this group, and you'll see that Lewin is a knowledgeable and helpful contributor who goes out of his way to help people - /if/ they are willing to listen. You have lost a good potential source of help and information here. And I think you'll get little advice from many of the other experienced members of c.a.e., including Hans-Bernhard and myself. Oh, and please learn to use Usenet - don't top-post.
> On Thu, 23 Dec 2010 09:21:47 -0800 (PST), larwe<zwsdotcom@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> On Dec 23, 12:12 am, justme<jble...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Wrong. Think again. >> >> Call back when you have a clue. The fact that everyone is telling you >> "go ARM" should mean something.
I have emailed them and got no answer.

Will keep trying.

Thanks for the tips.

Joe

On Thu, 23 Dec 2010 23:45:58 -0500, Neil <NeilKurzm@worldnet.att.net>
wrote:

>On 12/23/2010 4:22 PM, justme wrote: >> Thanks, Neil, I will check those out. >> >> For some odd reason, I cannot log on/register to 8052.com. >> >> Joe >> >> On Thu, 23 Dec 2010 01:22:29 -0500, Neil<NeilKurzm@worldnet.att.net> >> wrote: >> >>> On 12/21/2010 7:16 PM, justme wrote: >>>> You-all came through. However, I was overwhelmed yet, I still haven't >>>> found what I need. >>>> >>>> I am looking for an 8051 uc that has lots of flash and lots of ram and >>>> an internal rtc and some a/d and d/a. SPI and I2C would be very nice. >>>> I took a hiatus when the 89c668/9 series was in vogue and now, it >>>> doesn't SEEM like there has been a huge amount of new versions. >>>> >>>> Where am I going wrong? >>>> >>>> Thank you. >>>> >>> Try SIlabs or Analog Devices. >>> www.8052.com maybe a better place to ask the question. >Not sure why try and email them. >Keil.com has a 8052 core search tool. Note that everything it lists is >still in production.