As long as I am griping, I'm trying to read the schematics for the MSP-EXP430FR4133 and they are a royal PITA. First they use a light grey for the text on the pages. I have no idea who thought light grey is an acceptable color for anything on a drawing that you actually intend people to read. IDIOTS! Secondly, the only text anywhere on the drawing that can be treated as text by selecting, copying or searching are the bloody pin numbers on the parts. There is no way to search for net names to see what goes where. IDIOTS! Finally the text labeling the pins is incredibly microscopically small! It is less than half the height of the other text on the page. IDIOTS! Anyone know what schematic package TI is using for their drawings? I want to make sure I never use it. I will say they appear to have an interesting design for measuring the power of the target. It appears they are using a DCDC converter controlled by an MCU to measure the current by counting the on time of the pass transistor. I wonder what the benefit of this is over just using a series resistor and measuring the voltage delta across it. They are dropping 5 volts to 3.3, so the resistor could be between the regulator output and the sense point and not cost any extra voltage drop. They have some patents on this method and even on a compiler feature that lets you measure the power of code functions and optimize for speed the sections that use the most power. The patent abstract isn't clear on how automated this is. One thing I noticed is that the patents all very specifically mention using an inductor. So if this is instead done with a switched capacitor bank, it would not violate any patents except maybe the compiler patent. -- Rick C
Total Frustration with TI
Started by ●March 23, 2017
Reply by ●March 23, 20172017-03-23
Reply by ●March 24, 20172017-03-24
On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 22:11:59 -0400, rickman wrote:> [ ... ] First they use a light grey > for the text on the pages. I have no idea who thought light grey is an > acceptable color for anything on a drawing that you actually intend > people to read. IDIOTS!I think contract web designers designing for their portfolios, not for the product. Everything looks like a high-end restaurant menu.