joep wrote:> yea, it has a internal 48Mhz oscillator, I wonder if thats just a > trimmed R/C oscillator, usually they aren't good enough for serial > timing,Presumably it is phase locked to the incoming USB clock so it will be as accurate as the PC's clock. kevin
Tiny and cheap little USB to UART bridge
Started by ●June 30, 2005
Reply by ●July 4, 20052005-07-04
Reply by ●July 4, 20052005-07-04
[topposting has been fixed] On 2 Jul 2005 13:24:32 -0700, <picuser@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:> joep wrote: >> yea, it has a internal 48Mhz oscillator, I wonder if thats just a >> trimmed R/C oscillator, usually they aren't good enough for serial >> timing, > > All I can say is that I have used them with the 921600baud rate and it > works perfectly.But you have designed them, haven't you? So you can provide the exact answer. Vadim
Reply by ●July 7, 20052005-07-07
Uwe Bonnes wrote:> Before using that chip, think about the company politics about not releasing > a linux open source driver (http://www.kroah.com/log/2004/11/18/).thanks for that one! In your link Greg says: "...If people are looking for a good usb to serial chip that is supported on Linux, Windows, and OS-X, there's the PL2303 device from Prolific, and the FTDI-SIO chip, and the MCT-U232 chip. All of these work very well on Linux, and are fully supported by all distros. I think they even might be cheaper than the CP2101 device..." since I had much trouble in the past with binary-only distributed "drivers" (not to mention the GPL violation in this special case), I would also recommend not to use this CP2101. Or to write to "Silicon Laboratories" and ask for source of drivers :-)