ARM9 Choice

On 27 =AAubat, 18:45, Albert van der Horst <alb...@spenarnc.xs4all.nl>
wrote:
> In article <20837b2e-d96a-4da3-8cf2-18f629a1b...@b29g2000hsa.googlegroups.=
com>,
>
> icegray =A0<iceg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >Hi,
> >I am looking for cpu for a automotive infotainment project. Project
> >details are 800x600 lcd, graphical charts, graphical user interfaces,
> >audio (MP3 and Radio), CAN Bus communication, probably embedded linux,
> >maybe rear camera and gps, etc.
> >I have been using Renesas M16C series as 16 bit Microcontroller and I
> >need a powerfull 32bit CPU. I don't think use SuperH series because
> >ARM9 has a lot of documets and sources i think. Freescale MX9328MX21S
> >and Atmel SAM9263 or SAM9261 can better choices ? Could you please
> >share your experiences about this subject?
>
> If your experience is with Renesas why not move up to M32C?
>
> >Thanks in advance
>
> --
> --
> Albert van der Horst, UTRECHT,THE NETHERLANDS
> Economic growth -- like all pyramid schemes -- ultimately falters.
> albert@spe&ar&c.xs4all.nl &=3Dnhttp://home.hccnet.nl/a.w.m.van.der.horst

There are more ARM users so more document and more support. Also ARM
is better than M32C to future.