|
I have integrated MPLAB 5.70.40 with HI-TECH PICC
compiler v8.02 PL1 but failed.When I only compiled just a simple .c file,it
appear this message:MPLAB is unable to find output file "DELAY.HEX".
This may be due to a compile, assemble, or link
process failure.Here is all I have done:
1.Click on the Option menu in the mehu bar, and select
Environment setup,in this new dialog box,I have setted
Default language suite to HI-TECH PICC.
2.Click on the Project menu in the menu bar,and select
Install Language Tool,in here,I have setted
the location of the compiler,assembler and linker of the HI-TECH compiler that I
have installed.The executable for all three tools(compiler/assembler/linker) is
setted to picc.exe.
3.I have added two environment variable showed below:
HTC_ERR_FORMAT=Error[000] %f %l : %s
HTC_WARN_FORMAT=Warning[000] %f %l : %s Even I have done above step,but it also not
success.
How to solve this problem?I am using MPLAB-ICD not
MPLAB-ICD2,so please don't advise me to use MPLAB v6.xx.
Any help will very appreciate!
Bruce Sam |
|
|
MPLAB 5.70.40 is integrated with HI-TECH PICC compiler v8.02 PL1
Started by ●October 15, 2004
Reply by ●October 15, 20042004-10-15
|
I was going to buy the HI-TECH PICC compiler yesterday, thinking of the $100-$400 range. Then I saw the price. :o Is it going to save me that much work with real time machine control programs? Chad --- Bruce Sam <> wrote: > I have integrated MPLAB 5.70.40 with HI-TECH PICC compiler v8.02 > PL1 but failed.When I only compiled just a simple .c file,it appear > this message:MPLAB is unable to find output file "DELAY.HEX". > This may be due to a compile, assemble, or link process > failure.Here is all I have done: > 1.Click on the Option menu in the mehu bar, and select Environment > setup,in this new dialog box,I have setted Default language suite to > HI-TECH PICC. > 2.Click on the Project menu in the menu bar,and select Install > Language Tool,in here,I have setted the location of the > compiler,assembler and linker of the HI-TECH compiler that I have > installed.The executable for all three > tools(compiler/assembler/linker) is setted to picc.exe. > 3.I have added two environment variable showed below: > HTC_ERR_FORMAT=Error[000] %f %l : %s > HTC_WARN_FORMAT=Warning[000] %f %l : %s > Even I have done above step,but it also not success. > How to solve this problem?I am using MPLAB-ICD not MPLAB-ICD2,so > please don't advise me to use MPLAB v6.xx. > Any help will very appreciate! > Bruce Sam > > --------------------------------- > |
|
|
Reply by ●October 15, 20042004-10-15
|
Look at www.microchipc.com for a good description of
configuration.
Regards
Ian
|
Reply by ●October 15, 20042004-10-15
|
I don't have much of an issue with the first cost, it is the maintenance fee that keeps me from buying their product. I don't expect free upgrades but I absolutely expect free fixes to a product found to be defective after I purchased it. But that's just me... I have used the free version, PIC C Lite, and it works quite well. I particularly like being able to put function pointers in state tables. CC5X won't allow this. As I would integrate PIC C into MPLAB, I don't see the advantage of the Windows versions with yet another IDE. I only use 14 bit parts (no real reason, just works out that way) so I would only need one version and that would cost just $125. Not a staggering amount. But the maintenance fee is out of the question... I ran into a version of Pascal for the PIC at http://www.picant.com/p2c/p.html. I imagine everyone else has already tried it but, somehow, I missed it. I like Pascal a lot more than I like C or JAL so maybe I'll give it a try for the next project. It kind of depends on the code generation. Small is good. I have used Embedded Pascal for an 8051 project and it is a great product if anyone ever needs something for that family of devices. --- In , Chad Russel <chadrussel@y...> wrote: > I was going to buy the HI-TECH PICC compiler yesterday, thinking of > the $100-$400 range. Then I saw the price. :o Is it going to save me > that much work with real time machine control programs? > > Chad > > --- Bruce Sam <persevreman@y...> wrote: > > > I have integrated MPLAB 5.70.40 with HI-TECH PICC compiler v8.02 > > PL1 but failed.When I only compiled just a simple .c file,it appear > > this message:MPLAB is unable to find output file "DELAY.HEX". > > This may be due to a compile, assemble, or link process > > failure.Here is all I have done: > > 1.Click on the Option menu in the mehu bar, and select Environment > > setup,in this new dialog box,I have setted Default language suite to > > HI-TECH PICC. > > 2.Click on the Project menu in the menu bar,and select Install > > Language Tool,in here,I have setted the location of the > > compiler,assembler and linker of the HI-TECH compiler that I have > > installed.The executable for all three > > tools(compiler/assembler/linker) is setted to picc.exe. > > 3.I have added two environment variable showed below: > > HTC_ERR_FORMAT=Error[000] %f %l : %s > > HTC_WARN_FORMAT=Warning[000] %f %l : %s > > Even I have done above step,but it also not success. > > How to solve this problem?I am using MPLAB-ICD not MPLAB- ICD2,so > > please don't advise me to use MPLAB v6.xx. > > Any help will very appreciate! > > > > > > Bruce Sam > > > > > > > > --------------------------------- > > |
|
|
Reply by ●October 15, 20042004-10-15
|
It's not just you. I bought the CCS C Compiler. It is a great compiler that I can no longer live without, but I am appalled that you can't get bug fixes for more than 30 days. If I would have had a better choice, I would have went with it instead of CCS. I'm sure they know that their (real) competitors also have crappy support. BRW --- In , "rtstofer" <rstofer@p...> wrote: > > > I don't have much of an issue with the first cost, it is the > maintenance fee that keeps me from buying their product. I don't > expect free upgrades but I absolutely expect free fixes to a product > found to be defective after I purchased it. But that's just me... > > I have used the free version, PIC C Lite, and it works quite well. > I particularly like being able to put function pointers in state > tables. CC5X won't allow this. > > As I would integrate PIC C into MPLAB, I don't see the advantage of > the Windows versions with yet another IDE. I only use 14 bit parts > (no real reason, just works out that way) so I would only need one > version and that would cost just $125. Not a staggering amount. > But the maintenance fee is out of the question... > |
Reply by ●October 15, 20042004-10-15
|
If only there was a viable open-source
alternative for PIC like AVR-GCC for AVR
|
|
|
Reply by ●October 15, 20042004-10-15
|
There is SDCC, an open-source C that is 'almost' ready according to Al Williams at http://tutor.al-williams.com/picc1.htm. I haven't tried it and I am not anxious to do so. It seems I spend a lot more time trying to figure out why compiled code doesn't work than I save by using the compiler in the first place. Most of my projects are well under 1000 lines of assembly code - it's a microcontroller, not a mainframe! But I admit that I am sometimes too lazy to work out the nitty- gritty details and that data structures are more clearly represented in C, so I use it from time to time. --- In , "Nigel Symes" <symesbris@h...> wrote: > If only there was a viable open-source alternative for PIC like AVR-GCC for AVR > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Bennet Williams > To: > Sent: Saturday, October 16, 2004 6:07 AM > Subject: [piclist] Re: MPLAB 5.70.40 is integ .... Sorry, coincidence, so new thread. Is it worth it? > It's not just you. I bought the CCS C Compiler. It is a great > compiler that I can no longer live without, but I am appalled that > you can't get bug fixes for more than 30 days. If I would have had a > better choice, I would have went with it instead of CCS. I'm sure > they know that their (real) competitors also have crappy support. > > BRW > > --- In , "rtstofer" <rstofer@p...> wrote: > > > > > > I don't have much of an issue with the first cost, it is the > > maintenance fee that keeps me from buying their product. I don't > > expect free upgrades but I absolutely expect free fixes to a > product > > found to be defective after I purchased it. But that's just me... > > > > I have used the free version, PIC C Lite, and it works quite well. > > I particularly like being able to put function pointers in state > > tables. CC5X won't allow this. > > > > As I would integrate PIC C into MPLAB, I don't see the advantage of > > the Windows versions with yet another IDE. I only use 14 bit parts > > (no real reason, just works out that way) so I would only need one > > version and that would cost just $125. Not a staggering amount. > > But the maintenance fee is out of the question... > > > to unsubscribe, go to http://www.yahoogroups.com and follow the instructions > > > ------------------------------- ----------- > Yahoo! Groups Links > > a.. To |
Reply by ●October 15, 20042004-10-15
|
--- In , Bruce Sam <persevreman@y...> wrote: > I have integrated MPLAB 5.70.40 with HI-TECH PICC compiler v8.02 PL1 but failed.When I only compiled just a simple .c file,it appear this message:MPLAB is unable to find output file "DELAY.HEX". > This may be due to a compile, assemble, or link process failure.Here is all I have done: > 1.Click on the Option menu in the mehu bar, and select Environment setup,in this new dialog box,I have setted Default language suite to HI-TECH PICC. > 2.Click on the Project menu in the menu bar,and select Install Language Tool,in here,I have setted the location of the compiler,assembler and linker of the HI-TECH compiler that I have installed.The executable for all three tools (compiler/assembler/linker) is setted to picc.exe. > 3.I have added two environment variable showed below: > HTC_ERR_FORMAT=Error[000] %f %l : %s > HTC_WARN_FORMAT=Warning[000] %f %l : %s > Even I have done above step,but it also not success. > How to solve this problem?I am using MPLAB-ICD not MPLAB- ICD2,so please don't advise me to use MPLAB v6.xx. > Any help will very appreciate! > Bruce Sam > Have you added #include <pic.h> ? If your code has something in it thats defined in pic.h like; __IDLOC(),__CONFIG(), or di() and you try to compile it without pic.h it will give you that error(MPLAB is unable to find output file...) |
Reply by ●October 15, 20042004-10-15
|
For hobbyists, I don't see a problem with JAL. Mike --- In , "Nigel Symes" <symesbris@h...> wrote: > If only there was a viable open-source alternative for PIC like AVR- GCC for AVR |
Reply by ●October 15, 20042004-10-15
|
Yeah - I might have a closer look at
JAL
|
|
|
